Flow reduction in high-flow arteriovenous access using intraoperative flow monitoring

This study used intraoperative monitoring of the access flow to evaluate the results of flow reduction in the management of high-flow arteriovenous access-related symptoms of distal ischemia and cardiac insufficiency. A retrospective study was conducted of 95 patients (78 with ischemia, 17 with card...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of vascular surgery Vol. 44; no. 6; pp. 1273 - 1278
Main Authors: Zanow, Juergen, Petzold, Karen, Petzold, Michael, Krueger, Ulf, Scholz, Hans
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-12-2006
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study used intraoperative monitoring of the access flow to evaluate the results of flow reduction in the management of high-flow arteriovenous access-related symptoms of distal ischemia and cardiac insufficiency. A retrospective study was conducted of 95 patients (78 with ischemia, 17 with cardiac failure) who underwent flow reduction between 1999 and 2005. A preoperatively measured access flow-volume rate >800 mL/min for autogenous accesses (n = 77) and >1200 mL/min for prosthetic accesses (n = 18) was the selection criterion for the use of a flow reduction procedure. Flow reduction was achieved using a spindle-like narrowing suture near the anastomosis and final placement of a polytetrafluoroethylene strip while a flow meter was used for intraoperatively measuring the access flow. The desired postoperative flow was 400 mL/min for autogenous and 600 mL/min for prosthetic accesses. The mean preoperative access flow was 1469 ± 633 mL/min in patients with ischemia and 2084 ± 463 mL/min in patients with cardiac failure, without significant differences between access types. The flow was reduced to 499 ± 175 mL/min for autogenous accesses and to 676 ± 47 mL/min for prosthetic accesses. The mean follow-up was 25 months (range, 1 to 73 months). Complete long-term relief of symptoms was observed in 86% of patients with ischemia and in 96% of patients with cardiac failure. Reconstruction significantly increased the digital-brachial index (0.41 ± 0.12 vs 0.74 ± 0.11; P < .05) and mean distal arterial pressure (47 ± 17 mm Hg vs 79 ± 21 mm Hg; P < .05) in patients with ischemia. Primary patency rates were significantly better for reconstructed autogenous accesses compared with rates of prosthetic accesses (91% ± 4% vs 58% ± 12% at 12 months; 81% ± 6% vs 41% ± 14% at 36 months; P < .001). The low patency of reconstructed prosthetic accesses is due to the high thrombosis risk of accesses that have a flow <700 mL/min. Flow reduction using intraoperative access flow monitoring is an effective and durable technique allowing for the correction of distal ischemia and cardiac insufficiency in patients with a high-flow autogenous access. The desired postoperative access flow of 400 mL/min is not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. Flow reduction of prosthetic access is as effective; however, a higher access flow than the desired 600 mL/min seems to be necessary to achieve an acceptable patency in prosthetic accesses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0741-5214
1097-6809
DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.010