Attentional Bias for Uncertain Cues of Shock in Human Fear Conditioning: Evidence for Attentional Learning Theory

We conducted a human fear conditioning experiment in which three different color cues were followed by an aversive electric shock on 0, 50, and 100% of the trials, and thus induced low (L), partial (P), and high (H) shock expectancy, respectively. The cues differed with respect to the (L < P <...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in human neuroscience Vol. 11; p. 266
Main Authors: Koenig, Stephan, Uengoer, Metin, Lachnit, Harald
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 23-05-2017
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We conducted a human fear conditioning experiment in which three different color cues were followed by an aversive electric shock on 0, 50, and 100% of the trials, and thus induced low (L), partial (P), and high (H) shock expectancy, respectively. The cues differed with respect to the (L < P < H) and the of their prediction (L < P > H). During conditioning we measured pupil dilation and ocular fixations to index differences in the attentional processing of the cues. After conditioning, the shock-associated colors were introduced as irrelevant distracters during visual search for a shape target while shocks were no longer administered and we analyzed the cues' potential to capture and hold overt attention automatically. Our findings suggest that fear conditioning creates an automatic attention bias for the conditioned cues that depends on their correlation with the aversive outcome. This bias was exclusively linked to the strength of the cues' shock association for the early attentional processing of cues in the visual periphery, but additionally was influenced by the uncertainty of the shock prediction after participants fixated on the cues. These findings are in accord with attentional learning theories that formalize how associative learning shapes automatic attention.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Martin J. Herrmann, University of Würzburg, Germany
Reviewed by: Tina B. Lonsdorf, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Nicholas Balderston, National Institute of Mental Health, United States
ISSN:1662-5161
1662-5161
DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00266