Neck-rail position in the free stall affects standing behavior and udder and stall cleanliness

• Published in: Journal of dairy science Vol. 92; no. 5; p. 1979
• Main Authors: Fregonesi, J A, von Keyserlingk, M A G, Tucker, C B, Veira, D M, Weary, D M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-05-2009
• Subjects: Animals; Behavior, Animal - physiology; Cattle; Defecation - physiology; Female; Housing, Animal - standards; Hygiene; Mammary Glands, Animal - physiology; Random Allocation; Time Factors; Urination - physiology
• ISSN: 1525-3198
• DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1604

This study tested the effect of neck-rail position on stall usage and udder and stall cleanliness. Thirty Holstein lactating cows were tested in groups of 6. Each group was tested with each of 5 neck-rail positions (130, 145, 160, 175, and 190 cm from the rear curb, at a constant height of 125 cm above the bedded surface) for 1 wk, with the order of testing allocated in a 5 x 5 Latin square. When the neck rail was positioned further from the rear curb, cows spent less time standing with their front 2 hooves in the stall (2.2 +/- 0.26 h/d at 130 cm vs. 1.7 +/- 0.27 h/d at 190 cm, mean +/- SE) and more time standing with all 4 hooves in the stall (0.0 +/- 0.02 h/d at 130 cm vs. 0.6 +/- 0.07 h/d at 190 cm). These effects of neck-rail position tended to be more marked for smaller cows, perhaps because the standing behavior of larger cows was restricted even in the 190-cm treatment. Cows were more likely to defecate and urinate in the stalls when the neck rail was positioned further from the rear curb. Cows using these stalls tended to have dirtier udders and these stalls required more cleaning time (0.4 +/- 0.16 min/d at the 130-cm position vs. 1.6 +/- 0.35 min/d at the 190-cm position). In summary, positioning the neck rail further from the curb increased the time that cows spent standing fully in the stall. This change in standing behavior is likely beneficial for hoof health, but reduced udder and stall cleanliness.