Functional performance testing in participants with functional ankle instability and in a healthy control group

• Published in: Journal of athletic training Vol. 43; no. 4; pp. 342 - 346
• Main Authors: Buchanan, Amanda S, Docherty, Carrie L, Schrader, John
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States National Athletic Trainers Association 01-07-2008; The National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc
• Subjects: Adult; Ankle; Ankle Injuries - diagnosis; Ankle Injuries - physiopathology; Ankle Injuries - prevention & control; Athletic Performance; Case-Control Studies; Control Groups; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Injuries; Joint Instability - diagnosis; Joint Instability - physiopathology; Joint Instability - prevention & control; Male; Motor Activity; Original Research; Outcome Measures; Patients; Performance Tests; Physical Fitness; Researchers; Scientific Concepts; Sports injuries; Sports training; Statistical Analysis; Studies; agility; assessment; ankle injuries
• ISSN: 1062-6050; 1938-162X
• DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.4.342

Functional ankle instability (FAI) affects a large part of the population. Inconsistent findings have been reported regarding the existence of functional performance deficits in individuals with FAI.
To examine functional performance in participants with FAI compared with participants in a control group during 2 hopping tests.
Case-control study.
Athletic training research laboratory.
There were 40 college-aged individuals who participated in our study: 20 with FAI and 20 without FAI. We defined FAI as history of an ankle sprain and residual episodes of "giving way."
Participants completed 2 functional performance tests (FPTs): the single-limb hopping and the single-limb hurdle tests.
Time to complete each test was recorded. Following each FPT, participants were asked if their ankles felt unstable during the test.
We found no difference between participants in the FAI and control groups for the hopping or hurdle tests (P > .05). When asked if their ankles felt unstable during the FPTs, approximately half of the participants in the FAI group and none of the participants in the control group reported a feeling of instability. Subsequently, a secondary analysis of variance was calculated with participants grouped into 3 categories: control participants, FAI participants reporting instability symptoms during FPT (FAI-S), and FAI participants not reporting instability symptoms during FPT (FAI-NS). Results revealed a difference among the 3 groups for the single-limb hopping test (P < .01). Post hoc analysis revealed a difference between the FAI-S participants and both the control and the FAI-NS participants. No difference was identified for the single-limb hurdle test (P = .41).
The FAI-S participants had performance deficits during the single-limb hopping test. Therefore, clinicians could use this simple hopping test as an additional method to determine the presence of FAI.