2019 Update of the Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for Endovascular Recanalization Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

• Published in: Journal of stroke Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 231 - 240
• Main Authors: Ko, Sang-Bae, Park, Hong-Kyun, Kim, Byung Moon, Heo, Ji Hoe, Rha, Joung-Ho, Kwon, Sun U, Kim, Jong S, Lee, Byung-Chul, Suh, Sang Hyun, Jung, Cheolkyu, Jeong, Hae Woong, Kang, Dong-Hun, Bae, Hee-Joon, Yoon, Byung-Woo, Hong, Keun-Sik
• Format: Journal Article Book Chapter
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Stroke Society 01-05-2019; 대한뇌졸중학회
• Subjects: cerebral infarction; Guideline; large cerebral artery occlusion; mechanical thrombolysis; reperfusion; 신경과학; Cerebral infarction; Guideline; Mechanical thrombolysis; Reperfusion; Large cerebral artery occlusion
• ISSN: 2287-6391; 1229-4101; 2287-6405
• DOI: 10.5853/jos.2019.00024

Endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) has been a standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion (LAO) within 6 hours after onset, since five landmark ERT trials conducted by 2015 demonstrated its clinical benefit. Recently, two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that ERT, even in the late time window of up to 16 hours or 24 hours after last known normal time, improved the outcome of patients who had a target mismatch, defined as either clinical-core mismatch or perfusion-core mismatch, which prompted the update of national guidelines in several countries. Accordingly, to provide evidence-based and up-to-date recommendations for ERT in patients with acute LAO in Korea, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Korean Stroke Society decided to revise the previous Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for ERT. For this update, the members of the writing group were appointed by the Korean Stroke Society and the Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology. After thoroughly reviewing the updated evidence from two recent trials and relevant literature, the writing members revised recommendations, for which formal consensus was achieved by convening an expert panel composed of 45 experts from the participating academic societies. The current guidelines are intended to help healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers make well-informed decisions and to improve the quality of care regarding ERT. The ultimate decision for ERT in a particular patient must be made in light of circumstances specific to that patient.