Real-time continuous glucose monitoring during labour and delivery in women with Type 1 diabetes - observations from a randomized controlled trial

Aims To explore whether real‐time continuous glucose monitoring during labour and delivery supplementary to hourly self‐monitored plasma glucose in women with Type 1 diabetes reduces the prevalence of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Methods Women with Type 1 diabetes participating in a randomized controlled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetic medicine Vol. 30; no. 11; pp. 1374 - 1381
Main Authors: Cordua, S., Secher, A. L., Ringholm, L., Damm, P., Mathiesen, E. R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-11-2013
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims To explore whether real‐time continuous glucose monitoring during labour and delivery supplementary to hourly self‐monitored plasma glucose in women with Type 1 diabetes reduces the prevalence of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Methods Women with Type 1 diabetes participating in a randomized controlled trial on the effect of real‐time continuous glucose monitoring in pregnancy were included in this study. Twenty‐seven of 60 (45%) women in the intervention arm used real‐time continuous glucose monitoring during labour and delivery, supplementary to hourly self‐monitored plasma glucose. Real‐time continuous glucose monitoring glucose data covering the last 8 h prior to delivery were retrospectively evaluated, and maternal hypo‐ and hyperglycaemia were defined as glucose values ≤ 3.9 mmol/l and > 7.0 mmol/l, respectively. Women in the control arm (n = 59) solely used self‐monitored plasma glucose. Neonatal hypoglycaemia was defined as a 2‐h plasma glucose < 2.5 mmol/l. Results In infants of women using real‐time continuous glucose monitoring during labour and delivery, 10 (37%) developed neonatal hypoglycaemia vs. 27 (46%) infants in the control arm (P = 0.45). Among 10 infants with and 17 infants without neonatal hypoglycaemia within the real‐time continuous glucose monitoring arm, median maternal self‐monitored plasma glucose was 6.2 (range 4.2–7.8) vs. 5.6 (3.3–8.5) mmol/l (P = 0.26) during labour and delivery, with maternal hyperglycaemia present in 17 (0–94) vs. 4 (0–46)% of the time (P = 0.02), and birthweight was 4040 (3102–4322) vs. 3500 (1829–4320) g (P = 0.04). Maternal hypoglycaemia up to delivery was relatively rare. Conclusions The prevalence of neonatal hypoglycaemia was comparable between infants of women using real‐time continuous glucose monitoring supplementary to self‐monitored plasma glucose during labour and delivery and infants of women solely using self‐monitored plasma glucose. What's new? In women with Type 1 diabetes using real‐time continuous glucose monitoring supplementary to hourly self‐monitored plasma glucose measurements during labour and delivery, the prevalence of neonatal hypoglycaemia was comparable with that of infants of women solely using self‐monitored plasma glucose. Despite median plasma glucose values within target range, mothers of infants with neonatal hypoglycaemia spent more time with glucose levels > 7.0 mmol/l during the last 8 h up to delivery compared with mothers of infants without neonatal hypoglycaemia. Maternal hypoglycaemia during the last 8 h up to delivery was relatively rare with this protocol on subcutaneous insulin administration.
Bibliography:The Novo Nordisk Foundation
ark:/67375/WNG-HP95L5JP-N
istex:51E653AA6A7E94C90F8C47E35E11437D8C1FE17D
Master joiner Sophus Jacobsen and wife Astrid Jacobsen's Foundation
Rigshospitalet's Research Foundation
Aase and Ejnar Danielsen's Foundation
ArticleID:DME12246
European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes and LifeScan
The Medical Faculty Foundation of Copenhagen University
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0742-3071
1464-5491
DOI:10.1111/dme.12246