The CbrA–CbrB two‐component regulatory system controls the utilization of multiple carbon and nitrogen sources in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A novel two‐component system, CbrA–CbrB, was discovered in Pseudomonas aeruginosa;cbrA and cbrB mutants of strain PAO were found to be unable to use several amino acids (such as arginine, histidine and proline), polyamines and agmatine as sole carbon and nitrogen sources. These mutants were also una...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular microbiology Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 917 - 931
Main Authors: Nishijyo, Takayuki, Haas, Dieter, Itoh, Yoshifumi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science, Ltd 01-05-2001
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A novel two‐component system, CbrA–CbrB, was discovered in Pseudomonas aeruginosa;cbrA and cbrB mutants of strain PAO were found to be unable to use several amino acids (such as arginine, histidine and proline), polyamines and agmatine as sole carbon and nitrogen sources. These mutants were also unable to use, or used poorly, many other carbon sources, including mannitol, glucose, pyruvate and citrate. A 7 kb EcoRI fragment carrying the cbrA and cbrB genes was cloned and sequenced. The cbrA and cbrB genes encode a sensor/histidine kinase (Mr 108 379, 983 residues) and a cognate response regulator (Mr 52 254, 478 residues) respectively. The amino‐terminal half (490 residues) of CbrA appears to be a sensor membrane domain, as predicted by 12 possible transmembrane helices, whereas the carboxy‐terminal part shares homology with the histidine kinases of the NtrB family. The CbrB response regulator shows similarity to the NtrC family members. Complementation and primer extension experiments indicated that cbrA and cbrB are transcribed from separate promoters. In cbrA or cbrB mutants, as well as in the allelic argR9901 and argR9902 mutants, the aot–argR operon was not induced by arginine, indicating an essential role for this two‐component system in the expression of the ArgR‐dependent catabolic pathways, including the aruCFGDB operon specifying the major aerobic arginine catabolic pathway. The histidine catabolic enzyme histidase was not expressed in cbrAB mutants, even in the presence of histidine. In contrast, proline dehydrogenase, responsible for proline utilization (Pru), was expressed in a cbrB mutant at a level comparable with that of the wild‐type strain. When succinate or other C4‐dicarboxylates were added to proline medium at 1 mM, the cbrB mutant was restored to a Pru+ phenotype. Such a succinate‐dependent Pru+ property was almost abolished by 20 mM ammonia. In conclusion, the CbrA–CbrB system controls the expression of several catabolic pathways and, perhaps together with the NtrB–NtrC system, appears to ensure the intracellular carbon: nitrogen balance in P. aeruginosa.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0950-382X
1365-2958
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02435.x