Survival after ultramassive transfusion: a review of 1360 cases
BACKGROUND Information about patient survival after transfusion of multiple blood volumes is limited, and most reports have focused on trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Retrospective study of blood use and survival at 11 hospitals in six nations between 2009 and 2013. Ultramassive transfusio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 56; no. 3; pp. 558 - 563 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-03-2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BACKGROUND
Information about patient survival after transfusion of multiple blood volumes is limited, and most reports have focused on trauma patients.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Retrospective study of blood use and survival at 11 hospitals in six nations between 2009 and 2013. Ultramassive transfusion (UMT) was defined as transfusion of 20 or more red blood cell (RBC) units over the course of any 2 consecutive calendar days.
RESULTS
A total of 1975 patients received UMT and a representative sample of 1360 patients was studied in detail. Patients were grouped into seven diagnostic categories: solid organ transplantation (n = 411), cardiac or major vascular surgery (n = 317), general surgery (n = 228), trauma (n = 221), general medicine (n = 124), obstetrics (n = 23), and other (n = 36). During the 7 days after initiation of UMT, these patients used more than 120,000 blood components. The median (interquartile range) blood use was 35 (26‐50) RBC units, 30 (20‐47) plasma units, and 7 (4‐13) platelet doses. Five‐ and 30‐day survival significantly declined with increasing RBC use. Overall survivals of patients receiving UMT were 71% (5 day) and 60% (30 day), and in the subset of 165 patients receiving 60 or more RBC units over 2 consecutive days, 5‐day survival was 54% ranging from 17% (trauma) to 75% (solid organ transplant). The decline in survival with increasing RBC transfusions was minimal for patients undergoing solid organ transplantation and was most pronounced for trauma and nonsurgical bleeding patients.
CONCLUSION
Trauma was not the leading cause of UMT. Increasing RBC requirements were significantly associated with decreasing survival. However, survival was more strongly associated with diagnostic category than total RBCs transfused, with highest survival rates in solid organ transplant surgery. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-GDF4C1LR-L ArticleID:TRF13370 istex:C4751E5F6FF95F89A012A009A5F011A4A7D4CECC ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0041-1132 1537-2995 |
DOI: | 10.1111/trf.13370 |