Optimal method for ablation of atypical AVNRT

• Published in: BMC cardiovascular disorders Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 264
• Main Authors: Aslani, Amir, Shahrzad, Shahab, Bazrafshan, Mehdi, Rahmanian, Mahdi, Fakhar, Reza, Pirahesh, Kasra, Bazrafshan, Hanieh, Bazrafshan, Hamed
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 19-05-2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Ablation; Arrhythmia; Atypical AVNRT; Bundle of His; Care and treatment; Catheter Ablation - adverse effects; Catheter Ablation - methods; Complications and side effects; Diagnosis; Diseases; Humans; Patient outcomes; Prospective Studies; Radiofrequency ablation; Radiofrequency Ablation - adverse effects; Recurrence; Relapse; Slow pathway; Supraventricular tachycardia; Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - surgery; Treatment Outcome; Iran; Ablation; Slow pathway; Atypical AVNRT
• ISSN: 1471-2261; 1471-2261
• DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03305-9

Considering that ablation of atypical AVNRT may be unsuccessful after ablation at the right posterior septum, in this study, we aimed to present an optimal method for ablation of atypical AVNRT. Also, we evaluated the efficacy of this technique for preventing recurrences.
This is a prospective, double-center study. It was conducted on 62 patients with atypical AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation. The patients were randomly divided into two groups before ablation: 1-Group A (n = 30): treated with conventional ablation at the anatomic area of the slow pathway; 2-Group B (n = 32): ablation was done 2 mm higher in the septum during fluoroscopy.
The mean age of patients in groups A and B were 54 ± 11.7 and 55 ± 12.2, respectively (P = 0.43). In group A, ablation was successful in 24 (80%) patients following right-sided slow pathway ablation, and the remaining patients required further treatment with either a left-side approach (N = 4, 13.3%) or ablation of additional regions (N = 2, 6.7%). In group B, ablation was successful in all patients. After a 48-month follow-up, recurrence of symptomatic atypical AVNRT was detected in 4 (13.3%) patients of group A and none of group B patients (p < 0.001).
In patients with atypical AVNRT, ablation 2 mm above the conventional area is more promising regarding success rate and recurrence of the arrhythmia.