Clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for ruptured thoracic aortic disease

• Published in: The Korean journal of internal medicine Vol. 36; no. Suppl 1; pp. S72 - S79
• Main Authors: Choi, Jong Hyun, Kim, Sang-Pil, Lee, Han Cheol, Park, Tae Sik, Park, Jong Ha, Kim, Bo Won, Ahn, Jinhee, Park, Jin Sup, Lee, Hye Won, Oh, Jun-Hyok, Choi, Jung Hyun, Cha, Kwang Soo, Hong, Taek Jong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 01-03-2021; 대한내과학회
• Subjects: aneurysm, dissecting; aorta; aortic aneurysm, thoracic; aortic rupture; Original; stents; 내과학; Aneurysm, dissecting; Aorta; Aortic aneurysm, thoracic; Aortic rupture; Stents
• ISSN: 1226-3303; 2005-6648
• DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2019.080

Untreated rupture of the thoracic aorta is associated with a high mortality rate. We aimed to review the clinical results of endovascular treatment for ruptured thoracic aortic disease.
We retrospectively reviewed data on 37 patients (mean age, 67.0 ± 15.18 years) treated for ruptured thoracic aortic disease from January 2005 to May 2016. The median follow-up duration was 308 days (interquartile range, 61 to 1,036.5). The primary end-point of the study was the composite of death, secondary intervention, endoleak, and major stroke/paraplegia after endovascular treatment.
The etiologies of ruptured thoracic aortic disease were aortic dissection (n = 11, 29.7%), intramural hematoma (n = 7, 18.9%), thoracic aortic aneurysm (n = 14, 37.8%), and traumatic aortic transection (n = 5, 13.5%). Three patients died within 24 hours of thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and one showed type I endoleak. The technical success rate was 89.2% (33/37). The in-hospital mortality rate was 13.5% (5/37); no deaths occurred during follow-up. The composite outcome rate during follow-up was 37.8% (14/37), comprising death (n = 5, 13.5%), secondary intervention (n = 5, 13.5%), endoleak (n = 5, 13.5%), and major stroke/paraplegia (n = 3, 8.1%). Left subclavian artery revascularization and proximal landing zone were not associated with the composite outcome. Low mean arterial pressure (MAP; ≤ 60 mmHg, [hazard ratio, 13.018; 95% confidence interval, 2.435 to 69.583, p = 0.003]) was the most significant predictor and high transfusion requirement in the first 24 hours was associated with event-free survival (log rank p = 0.018).
Endovascular treatment achieves high technical success rates and acceptable clinical outcome. High transfusion volume and low MAP were associated with poor clinical outcomes.