Comparison of two molecular techniques for the detection of avian reoviruses in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded chicken tissues
Reverse transcription (RT) in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques were used to detect the σc-encoded gene of avian reovirus (ARV) in chicken tissue sections. The advantage of using in situ methods is to make more rapid and accurate diagnosis of ARV infecti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of virological methods Vol. 80; no. 2; pp. 197 - 201 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
Elsevier B.V
01-07-1999
Amsterdam Elsevier New York, NY |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Reverse transcription (RT) in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques were used to detect the σc-encoded gene of avian reovirus (ARV) in chicken tissue sections. The advantage of using in situ methods is to make more rapid and accurate diagnosis of ARV infections. The sensitivity of these two techniques were compared. Of the two techniques, the RT in situ PCR test was found to be more sensitive than ISH and provided the rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of ARV infections. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0166-0934 1879-0984 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00047-6 |