Comparison of two molecular techniques for the detection of avian reoviruses in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded chicken tissues

Reverse transcription (RT) in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques were used to detect the σc-encoded gene of avian reovirus (ARV) in chicken tissue sections. The advantage of using in situ methods is to make more rapid and accurate diagnosis of ARV infecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of virological methods Vol. 80; no. 2; pp. 197 - 201
Main Authors: Liu, Hung J., Liao, Ming H., Chang, C.D., Chen, Jen H., Lin, Maw Y., Tung, Ming C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Elsevier B.V 01-07-1999
Amsterdam Elsevier
New York, NY
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Reverse transcription (RT) in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques were used to detect the σc-encoded gene of avian reovirus (ARV) in chicken tissue sections. The advantage of using in situ methods is to make more rapid and accurate diagnosis of ARV infections. The sensitivity of these two techniques were compared. Of the two techniques, the RT in situ PCR test was found to be more sensitive than ISH and provided the rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of ARV infections.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0166-0934
1879-0984
DOI:10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00047-6