The Perception and Misperception of Specular Surface Reflectance

• Published in: Current biology Vol. 22; no. 20; pp. 1909 - 1913
• Main Authors: Marlow, Phillip J., Kim, Juno, Anderson, Barton L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Inc 23-10-2012
• Subjects: Biological Sciences; Contrast Sensitivity; Depth Perception; Form Perception; Humans; Illusions; Light; lighting; Photic Stimulation; Psychophysics; reflectance; Visual Perception
• ISSN: 0960-9822; 1879-0445
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.009

The amount and spectral content of the light reflected by most natural surfaces depends on the structure of the light field, the observer’s viewing position, and 3D surface geometry, particularly for specular (glossy) surfaces. A growing body of data has demonstrated that perceived surface gloss can vary as a function of its 3D shape [1–5] and its illumination field [6–12], but there is currently no explanation for these effects. Here, we show that the perception of gloss can be understood as a direct consequence of image properties that covary with surface geometry and the illumination field. We show that different illumination fields can generate qualitatively different patterns of interaction between perceived gloss and 3D surface geometry. Despite the complexity and variability of these interactions, we demonstrate that the perception (and misperception) of gloss is well predicted by the way that each illumination field modulates the size, contrast, sharpness, and depth of specular reflections. Our results provide a coherent explanation of the effects of extrinsic scene variables on perceived gloss [1–13], and our methods suggest a general technique for assessing the role of specific image properties in modulating our visual experience of material properties.
[Display omitted]
► Investigated why irrelevant scene attributes influence perception of surface gloss ► Found gloss judgments exhibit complex interactions between illumination and 3D shape ► Four proximal cues can account for interactions between light field, shape, and gloss ► Suggests that these cues mediate the perception and misperception of gloss