Relative effects of LDL-C on ischemic stroke and coronary disease: A Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVETo examine the causal relevance of lifelong differences in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) for ischemic stroke (IS) relative to that for coronary heart disease (CHD) using a Mendelian randomization approach. METHODSWe undertook a 2-sample Mendelian randomization, based on summar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurology Vol. 92; no. 11; pp. e1176 - e1187
Main Authors: Valdes-Marquez, Elsa, Parish, Sarah, Clarke, Robert, Stari, Traiani, Worrall, Bradford B, Hopewell, Jemma C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States American Academy of Neurology 12-03-2019
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVETo examine the causal relevance of lifelong differences in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) for ischemic stroke (IS) relative to that for coronary heart disease (CHD) using a Mendelian randomization approach. METHODSWe undertook a 2-sample Mendelian randomization, based on summary data, to estimate the causal relevance of LDL-C for risk of IS and CHD. Information from 62 independent genetic variants with genome-wide significant effects on LDL-C levels was used to estimate the causal effects of LDL-C for IS and IS subtypes (based on 12,389 IS cases from METASTROKE) and for CHD (based on 60,801 cases from CARDIoGRAMplusC4D). We then assessed the effects of LDL-C on IS and CHD for heterogeneity. RESULTSA 1 mmol/L higher genetically determined LDL-C was associated with a 50% higher risk of CHD (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32−1.68, p = 1.1 × 10). By contrast, the causal effect of LDL-C was much weaker for IS (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96−1.30, p = 0.14; p for heterogeneity = 2.6 × 10) and, in particular, for cardioembolic stroke (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84−1.33, p = 0.64; p for heterogeneity = 8.6 × 10) when compared with that for CHD. CONCLUSIONSIn contrast with the consistent effects of LDL-C-lowering therapies on IS and CHD, genetic variants that confer lifelong LDL-C differences show a weaker effect on IS than on CHD. The relevance of etiologically distinct IS subtypes may contribute to the differences observed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
METASTROKE Consortium of the ISGC coinvestigators are listed in appendix 2 at the end of the article.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the British Heart Foundation under the COAF Partnership.
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article. The Article Processing Charge was funded by the British Heart Foundation under the COAF Partnership.
ISSN:0028-3878
1526-632X
1526-632X
DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007091