Comparative Effectiveness of Chemotherapy Alone Versus Radiotherapy-Based Regimens in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Analysis (PAULA-1)

• Published in: Current oncology (Toronto) Vol. 30; no. 6; pp. 5690 - 5703
• Main Authors: Arcelli, Alessandra, Tarantino, Giuseppe, Cellini, Francesco, Buwenge, Milly, Macchia, Gabriella, Bertini, Federica, Guido, Alessandra, Deodato, Francesco, Cilla, Savino, Scotti, Valerio, Rosetto, Maria Elena, Djan, Igor, Parisi, Salvatore, Mattiucci, Gian Carlo, Fiore, Michele, Bonomo, Pierluigi, Belgioia, Liliana, Niespolo, Rita Marina, Gabriele, Pietro, Di Marco, Mariacristina, Simoni, Nicola, Ma, Johnny, Strigari, Lidia, Mazzarotto, Renzo, Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01-06-2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Cancer; chemoradiation; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemotherapy; conventionally fractionated radiotherapy; Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatic Neoplasms - drug therapy; Pancreatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Radiosurgery - methods; Radiotherapy; Retrospective Studies; stereotactic body radiotherapy; stereotactic body radiotherapy; pancreatic cancer; conventionally fractionated radiotherapy; chemoradiation; chemotherapy
• ISSN: 1718-7729; 1198-0052; 1718-7729
• DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060427

Different options for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are available based on international guidelines: chemotherapy (CHT), chemoradiation (CRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, the role of radiotherapy is debated in LAPC. We retrospectively compared CHT, CRT, and SBRT ± CHT in a real-world setting in terms of overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). LAPC patients from a multicentric retrospective database were included (2005-2018). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify predictors of LC, OS, and DMFS. Of the 419 patients included, 71.1% were treated with CRT, 15.5% with CHT, and 13.4% with SBRT. Multivariable analysis showed higher LC rates for CRT (HR: 0.56,
CI 0.34-0.92,
= 0.022) or SBRT (HR: 0.27,
CI 0.13-0.54,
< 0.001), compared to CHT. CRT (HR: 0.44,
CI 0.28-0.70,
< 0.001) and SBRT (HR: 0.40,
CI 0.22-0.74,
= 0.003) were predictors of prolonged OS with respect to CHT. No significant differences were recorded in terms of DMFS. In selected patients, the addition of radiotherapy to CHT is still an option to be considered. In patients referred for radiotherapy, CRT can be replaced by SBRT considering its duration, higher LC rate, and OS rate, which are at least comparable to that of CRT.