Robustness of Latent Profile Analysis to Measurement Noninvariance Between Profiles

• Published in: Educational and psychological measurement Vol. 82; no. 1; pp. 5 - 28
• Main Authors: Wang, Yan, Kim, Eunsook, Yi, Zhiyao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-02-2022; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Classification; Educational tests & measurements; Profiles; Robustness (Statistics); Scores; Statistical Analysis; factor scores; measurement noninvariance; latent profile analysis; factor mixture modeling; composite scores
• ISSN: 0013-1644; 1552-3888
• DOI: 10.1177/0013164421997896

Latent profile analysis (LPA) identifies heterogeneous subgroups based on continuous indicators that represent different dimensions. It is a common practice to measure each dimension using items, create composite or factor scores for each dimension, and use these scores as indicators of profiles in LPA. In this case, measurement models for dimensions are not included and potential noninvariance across latent profiles is not modeled in LPA. This simulation study examined the robustness of LPA in terms of class enumeration and parameter recovery when the noninvariance was unmodeled by using composite or factor scores as profile indicators. Results showed that correct class enumeration rates of LPA were relatively high with small degree of noninvariance, large class separation, large sample size, and equal proportions. Severe bias in profile indicator mean difference was observed with intercept and loading noninvariance, respectively. Implications for applied researchers are discussed.