Electrospun synthetic and natural nanofibers for regenerative medicine and stem cells
Nanofibers are attractive substrates for tissue regeneration applications because they structurally mimic the native extracellular matrix. Electrospinning has been recognized as one of the most efficient techniques to fabricate polymer nanofibers. Recent research has demonstrated that cellular respo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biotechnology journal Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 59 - 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Weinheim
WILEY-VCH Verlag
01-01-2013
WILEY‐VCH Verlag |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Nanofibers are attractive substrates for tissue regeneration applications because they structurally mimic the native extracellular matrix. Electrospinning has been recognized as one of the most efficient techniques to fabricate polymer nanofibers. Recent research has demonstrated that cellular responses, for example attachment, proliferation and differentiation, can be modulated by tuning nanofiber properties. In combination with other processing techniques, such as particulate leaching or three‐dimensional printing, nanofibrous scaffolds incorporating macroporous networks could be developed to enhance infiltration of cells. Three dimensional nanofiber‐based constructs offer an opportunity to achieve advanced functional tissue regeneration. This review explores the advantageous effects of nanofibers on cell behaviors compared to traditional scaffolds.
Electrospun nanofibers can influence cellular behavior. Nanofibers are attractive for use in tissue regeneration because they structurally mimic the native extracelluar matrix. Electrospinning has become one of the most efficient techniques for the fabrication of polymer nanofibers. Cellular activities, such as attachment, proliferation and differentiation, can be modulated by tuning the nanofiber properties including chemical composition, fiber morphology, diameter and alignment. This review explores the advantages of nanofibers compared to traditional scaffolds. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:E131F6F2D19BF761A0B5CE0AC1E510BDA3AF6638 ArticleID:BIOT201200249 NRF-Technion grant - WBS No. R-398-001-065-592 Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Initiative, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore ark:/67375/WNG-NTB2JHPZ-7 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 1860-6768 1860-7314 |
DOI: | 10.1002/biot.201200249 |