Understanding the impact of dam-triggered land use/land cover change on the modification of extreme precipitation

• Published in: Water resources research Vol. 48; no. 9; pp. np - n/a
• Main Authors: Woldemichael, Abel T., Hossain, Faisal, Pielke Sr, Roger, Beltrán-Przekurat, Adriana
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2012; John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subjects: artificial reservoirs; Dams; extreme precipitation; Extreme weather; Hydrometeorology; Irrigation; Land use; PMP; Precipitation; Probable maximum precipitation; Relative humidity; Reservoirs; River basins; Watersheds
• ISSN: 0043-1397; 1944-7973
• DOI: 10.1029/2011WR011684

Two specific questions are addressed in this study regarding dams (artificial reservoirs). (1) Can a dam (artificial reservoir) and the land use/land cover (LULC) changes triggered by it physically alter extreme precipitation? The term extreme precipitation (EP) is used as a way of representing the model‐derived upper bound of precipitation that pertains to the engineering definition of the standard probable maximum precipitation (PMP) used in design of dams. (2) Among the commonly experienced LULC changes due to dams, which type of change leads to the most detectable alteration of extreme precipitation? The American River Basin (ARW) and the Folsom dam were selected as a study region. Four scenarios of LULC change (comprising also various reservoir surface areas) were analyzed in a step by step fashion to elucidate the scenario leading to most significant impact on EP. The Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS, version 6.0) was used to analyze the impact of these LULC scenarios in two modes. In the first mode (called normal), the probable precipitation pattern due to each LULC scenario was identified. The second mode (called moisture‐maximized), the PMP pattern represented from a 100% relative humidity profile was generated as an indicator of extreme precipitation (EP). For the particular case of ARW and Folsom dam, irrigation was found as having the most detectable impact on EP (a 5% increase in 72 h total for the normal mode and a 3% increase for the moisture‐maximized mode) in and around the ARW watershed. Doubling the reservoir size, on the other hand, brought only a small change in EP. Our RAMS‐simulated results demonstrate that LULC changes driven by surrounding landscape alteration resulting from the dams can, in fact, alter the local to regional hydrometeorology as well as extreme precipitation. There is a strong possibility of a positive feedback mechanism initiated by irrigated landscapes located upwind of orographic rain producing watersheds that are impounded by large dams.
Key Points
Dam‐triggered LULC has detectable impact on precipitation
Irrigation has most impact on extreme precipitation
Redistribution of storm pattern requires a broader view for flood modeling