Prospective Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Continuous Passive Motion Post Total Knee Arthroplasty: Experience of the Hospital for Special Surgery

Abstract Conflicting evidence has created substantial controversy regarding the use of continuous passive motion (CPM) in the in-patient setting post total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 109 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, CPM or no CPM, applied after TKA. All patients received t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of arthroplasty Vol. 30; no. 12; pp. 2364 - 2369
Main Authors: Joshi, Rupali N., PT, PhD, MEd, White, Peter B., BA, Murray-Weir, Mary, PT, MBA, Alexiades, Michael M., MD, Sculco, Thomas P., MD, Ranawat, Amar S., MD
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-12-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Conflicting evidence has created substantial controversy regarding the use of continuous passive motion (CPM) in the in-patient setting post total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 109 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, CPM or no CPM, applied after TKA. All patients received the same physical therapy protocol (3 sessions per day), with the only exception being the CPM. Both groups had a knee flexion of 115° at 6 weeks and 120° at 3 months, with no significant differences (P = 0.69 and P = 0.41, respectively). Length of stay was significantly less for the group who did not receive CPM. The use of CPM had no clinically relevant benefits with respect to AROM, clinical outcomes or discharge disposition and was associated with a cost of $235.50 per TKA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.006