Scalar Co-SIMP dark matter: models and sensitivities
A bstract In this work, we present UV completions of the recently proposed number-changing Co-SIMP freeze-out mechanism. In contrast to the standard cannibalistic-type dark matter picture that occurs entirely in the dark sector, the 3 → 2 process setting the relic abundance in this case requires one...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of high energy physics Vol. 2023; no. 8; pp. 91 - 36 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
16-08-2023
Springer Nature B.V Springer Nature SpringerOpen |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A
bstract
In this work, we present UV completions of the recently proposed number-changing Co-SIMP freeze-out mechanism. In contrast to the standard cannibalistic-type dark matter picture that occurs entirely in the dark sector, the 3 → 2 process setting the relic abundance in this case requires one Standard Model particle in the initial and final states. This prevents the dark sector from overheating and leads to rich experimental signatures. We generate the Co-SIMP interaction with a dark sector consisting of two scalars, with the mediator coupling to either nucleons or electrons. In either case,
the dark matter candidate is naturally light
: nucleophilic interactions favor the sub-GeV mass range and leptophilic interactions favor the sub-MeV mass range. Viable thermal models in these lighter mass regimes are particularly intriguing to study at this time, as new developments in low-threshold detector technologies will begin probing this region of parameter space. While particles in the sub-MeV regime can potentially impact light element formation and CMB decoupling, we show that a late-time phase transition opens up large fractions of parameter space. These thermal light dark matter models can instead be tested with dedicated experiments. We discuss the viable parameter space in each scenario in light of the current sensitivity of various experimental probes and projected future reach. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP) Alfred P. Sloan Foundation National Science Foundation (NSF) AC02-05CH11231; SC0013607; G-2019-12504; PHY2210533; 623940 |
ISSN: | 1029-8479 1126-6708 1029-8479 |
DOI: | 10.1007/JHEP08(2023)091 |