Label-free assessment of high-affinity antibody–antigen binding constants. Comparison of bioassay, SPR, and PEIA-ellipsometry

Assessment of high-affinity antibody–antigen binding parameters is important in such diverse areas as selection of therapeutic antibodies, detection of unwanted hormones in cattle and sensitive immunoassays in clinical chemistry. Label-free assessment of binding affinities is often carried out by im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of immunological methods Vol. 365; no. 1-2; pp. 50 - 57
Main Authors: Rispens, Theo, te Velthuis, Henk, Hemker, Piet, Speijer, Han, Hermens, Wim, Aarden, Lucien
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 28-02-2011
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Assessment of high-affinity antibody–antigen binding parameters is important in such diverse areas as selection of therapeutic antibodies, detection of unwanted hormones in cattle and sensitive immunoassays in clinical chemistry. Label-free assessment of binding affinities is often carried out by immobilization of one of the binding partners on a biosensor chip, followed by monitoring the binding equilibrium of the other partner. However, for the measurement of high-affinity binding, with dissociation constants in the picomolar range or lower, equilibration times exceed practical limits and one has to resort to the measurement of sorption kinetics. Here we evaluate a new technique, using PEIA11PEIA = Precipitate-Enhanced ImmunoAssay.-ellipsometry and establishment of equilibrium in solution. Binding parameters are determined for two high-affinity anti-interleukin 6 antibodies, anti-IL6.16 and anti-IL6.8, and compared with values obtained by a bioassay, based on IL6-dependent cell growth, and with values obtained by a standard technique based on SPR.22SPR = Surface Plasmon Resonance. The high affinities of both antibodies as found with the bioassay (5 and 50pM for anti-IL6.8 and anti-IL6.16, respectively), could be conveniently measured by PEIA-ellipsometry. Using SPR, equilibrium measurements indeed proved too time-consuming and analysis of adsorption/desorption kinetics revealed that the binding of the antibodies on the chip caused the appearance of different populations of antibodies with different affinities.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2010.11.010
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0022-1759
1872-7905
DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2010.11.010