Evidence on the determinants and economic consequences of delegated monitoring

We investigate delegated monitoring by examining the determinants and effects of including cross-acceleration provisions in public debt contracts. We find that cross-acceleration provision use depends on borrowers' going concern relative to liquidation values, debt repayment structures, credit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of accounting & economics Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 555 - 576
Main Authors: Beatty, Anne, Liao, Scott, Weber, Joseph
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01-06-2012
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We investigate delegated monitoring by examining the determinants and effects of including cross-acceleration provisions in public debt contracts. We find that cross-acceleration provision use depends on borrowers' going concern relative to liquidation values, debt repayment structures, credit quality, and financial reporting quality. This suggests that the use of cross-acceleration provisions increases when the costs of cascading defaults are lower, the conflicts between creditor classes are higher, and the benefits of delegating monitoring to banks are higher. We also find a lower interest rate on public debt contracts with cross-acceleration provisions, but the rate reduction depends on borrowers' financial reporting quality. ► This paper examines the decision to use cross-acceleration provisions in public debt. ► We examine the determinants of the use of cross-acceleration provisions. ► We also examine the effect of these provisions on other contract terms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-4101
1879-1980
DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.12.002