Performance of the Global Forecast System's medium-range precipitation forecasts in the Niger river basin using multiple satellite-based products

• Published in: Hydrology and earth system sciences Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 167 - 181
• Main Authors: Yue, Haowen, Gebremichael, Mekonnen, Nourani, Vahid
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 13-01-2022; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Accumulation; Accuracy; Agriculture; Aquatic resources; Archives & records; Atmospheric precipitations; Bias; Climate; Climate change; Daily rainfall; Dams; Datasets; Environmental hazards; Forecast accuracy; Gauges; Hydroelectric power; Lead time; Management; Performance assessment; Performance testing; Precipitation; Precipitation forecasting; Rain; Rain and rainfall; Rainfall; Rainfall forecasting; River basins; Rivers; Satellite observation; Satellites; Savannahs; Time; Water; Water management; Water resources; Water resources management; Watersheds; Weather; Weather forecasting; Benin; Niger; West Africa; Niger River
• ISSN: 1607-7938; 1027-5606; 1607-7938
• DOI: 10.5194/hess-26-167-2022

Accurate weather forecast information has the potential to improve water resources management, energy, and agriculture. This study evaluates the accuracy of medium-range (1–15 d) precipitation forecasts from the Global Forecast System (GFS) over watersheds of eight major dams (Selingue Dam, Markala Dam, Goronyo Dam, Bakolori Dam, Kainji Dam, Jebba Dam, Dadin Kowa Dam, and Lagdo Dam) in the Niger river basin using NASA's Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals (IMERG) Final Run merged satellite gauge rainfall observations. The results indicate that the accuracy of GFS forecast varies depending on climatic regime, lead time, accumulation timescale, and spatial scale. The GFS forecast has large overestimation bias in the Guinea region of the basin (wet climatic regime), moderate overestimation bias in the Savannah region (moderately wet climatic regime), but has no bias in the Sahel region (dry climate). Averaging the forecasts at coarser spatial scales leads to increased forecast accuracy. For daily rainfall forecasts, the performance of GFS is very low for almost all watersheds, except for Markala and Kainji dams, both of which have much larger watershed areas compared to the other watersheds. Averaging the forecasts at longer timescales also leads to increased forecast accuracy. The GFS forecasts, at 15 d accumulation timescale, have better performance but tend to overestimate high rain rates. Additionally, the performance assessment of two other satellite products was conducted using IMERG Final estimates as reference. The Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS) merged satellite gauge product has similar rainfall characteristics to IMERG Final, indicating the robustness of IMERG Final. The IMERG Early Run satellite-only rainfall product is biased in the dry Sahel region; however, in the wet Guinea and Savannah regions, IMERG Early Run outperforms GFS in terms of bias.