Technical note: A method for calculating offsets to ozone depletion and climate impacts of ozone-depleting substances

• Published in: Atmospheric chemistry and physics Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 2023 - 2032
• Main Authors: Dreyfus, Gabrielle B, Montzka, Stephen A, Andersen, Stephen O, Ferris, Richard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 15-02-2024; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Air pollution; Analysis; Atmosphere; Atmospheric ozone; Built environment; Carbon sequestration; Chemicals; Chlorofluorocarbons; Climate; Depletion; Emissions; Environmental impact; Gases; Greenhouse effect; Greenhouse gases; Methods; Montreal Protocol; Offsets; Ozone; Ozone depletion; Ozone layer; Ozone layer depletion; Ozonosphere; Radiative forcing; Skin cancer; Stratosphere radiation; Ultraviolet radiation; Quebec; Canada; Montreal Quebec Canada; United States > US; China
• ISSN: 1680-7324; 1680-7316; 1680-7324
• DOI: 10.5194/acp-24-2023-2024

By phasing out production and consumption of most ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Montreal Protocol) has avoided consequences of increased ultraviolet (UV) radiation and will restore stratospheric ozone to pre-1980 conditions by mid-century, assuming compliance with the phaseout. However, several studies have documented an unexpected increase in emissions and suggested unreported production of trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) and potentially other ODSs after 2012 despite production phaseouts under the Montreal Protocol. Furthermore, because most ODSs are powerful greenhouse gases (GHGs), there are significant climate protection benefits in collecting and destroying the substantial quantities of historically allowed production of chemicals under the Montreal Protocol that are contained in existing equipment and products and referred to as ODS “banks”. This technical note presents a framework for considering offsets to ozone depletion, climate forcing, and other environmental impacts arising from occurrences of unexpected emissions and unreported production of Montreal Protocol controlled substances, as recently experienced and likely to be experienced again. We also show how this methodology could be applied to the destruction of banks of controlled ODSs and GHGs or to halon or other production allowed under a Montreal Protocol Essential Use Exemption or Critical Use Exemption. Further, we roughly estimate the magnitude of offset each type of action could provide for ozone depletion, climate, and other environmental impacts that Montreal Protocol Parties agree warrant remedial action.