A screening method of uranyl extractants in H2SO4 solutions

[Display omitted] •Selective complexing agents of U(VI) are at the basis of uranium recovery processes.•A screening method was developed for identification of U(VI)-selective molecules.•Series of mono and bisphosphonate molecules were examined.•Their affinity for U(VI) and Fe(III) was assessed in ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tetrahedron letters Vol. 56; no. 2; pp. 308 - 311
Main Authors: Pasquier, S., Vercouter, T., Taran, F., Lamouroux, C., Plancque, G., Berthet, J.-C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 08-01-2015
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Selective complexing agents of U(VI) are at the basis of uranium recovery processes.•A screening method was developed for identification of U(VI)-selective molecules.•Series of mono and bisphosphonate molecules were examined.•Their affinity for U(VI) and Fe(III) was assessed in acidic conditions by our method.•Two molecules out of fifty-one were found to be of potential interest. A UV–Vis spectrophotometric and colorimetric screening method was developed for the selection of powerful and selective ligands for the uranyl ion in sulfuric acid media. The coordinating properties of a series of molecules (mono and bisphosphonate) toward UO22+ were examined through ligand displacement reactions observed by UV–visible from the {ArzH4–UO2}2− reference complex where Na2ArzH6 is a chromogenic molecule displaying a strong affinity for uranium. Uranium/iron selectivity was evaluated by recovering the screening data from two independent sets of experiments using two different chromogenic chelates: arsenazo III for uranium(VI) and BrPADAP for iron(III). As a result, two bisphosphonate ligands among a set of more than 50 phosphonate molecules were found to display a good affinity for UO22+ and relevant U/Fe selectivity at pH=2.1.
ISSN:0040-4039
1873-3581
DOI:10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.11.068