Limited role for surveillance PET–CT scanning in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete metabolic remission following primary therapy
Background: The usefulness of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET–CT) in the surveillance of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in complete metabolic remission after primary therapy is not well studied. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our datab...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of cancer Vol. 109; no. 2; pp. 312 - 317 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
23-07-2013
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background:
The usefulness of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET–CT) in the surveillance of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in complete metabolic remission after primary therapy is not well studied.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective review of our database between 2002 and 2009 for patients with
de novo
DLBCL who underwent surveillance PET–CT after achieving complete metabolic response (CMR) following primary therapy.
Results:
Four-hundred and fifty scans were performed in 116 patients, with a median follow-up of 53 (range 8–133) months from completion of therapy. Thirteen patients (11%) relapsed: seven were suspected clinically and six were subclinical (all within first 18 months). The positive predictive value in patients with international prognostic index (IPI) <3 was 56% compared with 80% in patients with IPI⩾3. Including indeterminate scans, PET–CT retained high sensitivity 95% and specificity 97% for relapse.
Conclusion:
Positron emission tomography with computed tomography is not useful in patients for the majority of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in CMR after primary therapy, with the possible exception of patients with baseline IPI ⩾3 in the 18 months following completion of primary therapy. This issue could be addressed by a prospective clinical trial. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.2013.338 |