Modifying the Phenotypic Frailty Model in Predicting Risk of Major Osteoporotic Fracture in the Elderly

• Published in: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Vol. 18; no. 5; pp. 414 - 419
• Main Authors: Li, Guowei, PhD MSc, MBBS, Papaioannou, Alexandra, MD, Thabane, Lehana, PhD, Levine, Mitchell A.H., MD, Ioannidis, George, PhD, Wong, Andy K.O., PhD, Lau, Arthur, MD, Adachi, Jonathan D., MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-05-2017
• Subjects: Aged; aging; Female; Frail Elderly; Frailty - diagnosis; Geriatric Assessment; GLOW; Humans; Internal Medicine; Longitudinal Studies; major osteoporotic fracture; Medical Education; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Osteoporotic Fractures - etiology; Phenotypic frailty; predictive accuracy; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Assessment; Phenotypic frailty; predictive accuracy; aging; GLOW; major osteoporotic fracture
• ISSN: 1525-8610; 1538-9375
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.015

Abstract Introduction The phenotypic frailty (PF) model (including slow walking, low physical activity, exhaustion, weakness, and unintentional weight loss) has been widely used to quantify the degree of frailty and predict risks of adverse health outcomes for the elderly. However, evidence has shown that not all the components included in the PF model contribute equally, and low predictive accuracy of the PF model has been reported in predicting risks of outcomes. We aimed to improve predictive accuracy of the PF model in risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) in the elderly by modifying its weighting of individual components. Methods Data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) 3-year Hamilton cohort were used for this study. We used the multivariable Cox regression model to identify the updated weighting for components in the original PF model. The goodness of fit and discrimination were assessed for model performances. Results There were 3985 women included for analyses (mean age: 69.4 years). In the modified PF model, the updated weighting was 3 points for slowness and weakness, 2 points for weight loss, 1 point for poor endurance and exhaustion, and 1 point for low physical activity, respectively. The modified PF model could capture and categorize the future risk of MOF more accurately than the original model. Significant relationship between risks of MOF, falls, and death and the modified PF model was found. Compared with the original model, the modified PF model was a better fit to the data and with improved predictive accuracy. Conclusion Based on a simple and practical rescoring and recategorizing algorithm, the modified PF model could predict risks of adverse outcomes more accurately than the original model, reflecting a cost-effective way. More evidence is needed to validate the modified PF model and support its application in geriatric practice.