Restrained whole body plethysmography for measure of strain-specific and allergen-induced airway responsiveness in conscious mice

1 Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton; and 2 Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Submitted 23 April 2006 ; accepted in final form 2 July 2006 The mouse is the most extensively studied animal species in respiratory research, yet the technolog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 101; no. 5; pp. 1495 - 1505
Main Authors: Lofgren, Jennifer L. S, Mazan, Melissa R, Ingenito, Edward P, Lascola, Kara, Seavey, Molly, Walsh, Ashley, Hoffman, Andrew M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Bethesda, MD Am Physiological Soc 01-11-2006
American Physiological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1 Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton; and 2 Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Submitted 23 April 2006 ; accepted in final form 2 July 2006 The mouse is the most extensively studied animal species in respiratory research, yet the technologies available to assess airway function in conscious mice are not universally accepted. We hypothesized that whole body plethysmography employing noninvasive restraint (RWBP) could be used to quantify specific airway resistance (sRaw-RWBP) and airway responsiveness in conscious mice. Methacholine responses were compared using sRaw-RWBP vs. airway resistance by the forced oscillation technique (Raw-FOT) in groups of C57, A/J, and BALB/c mice. sRaw-RWBP was also compared with sRaw derived from double chamber plethysmography (sRaw-DCP) in BALB/c. Finally, airway responsiveness following allergen challenge in BALB/c was measured using RWBP. sRaw-RWBP in C57, A/J, and BALB/c mice was 0.51 ± 0.03, 0.68 ± 0.03, and 0.63 ± 0.05 cm/s, respectively. sRaw derived from Raw-FOT and functional residual capacity (Raw*functional residual capacity) was 0.095 cm/s, approximately one-fifth of sRaw-RWBP in C57 mice. The intra- and interanimal coefficients of variations were similar between sRaw-RWBP (6.8 and 20.1%) and Raw-FOT (3.4 and 20.1%, respectively). The order of airway responsiveness employing sRaw-RWBP was AJ > BALBc > C57 and for Raw-FOT was AJ > BALB/c = C57. There was no difference between the airway responsiveness assessed by RWBP vs. DCP; however, baseline sRaw-RWBP was significantly lower than sRaw-DCP. Allergen challenge caused a progressive decrease in the provocative concentration of methacholine that increased sRaw to 175% postsaline values based on sRaw-RWBP. In conclusion, the technique of RWBP was rapid, reproducible, and easy to perform. Airway responsiveness measured using RWBP, DCP, and FOT was equivalent. Allergen responses could be followed longitudinally, which may provide greater insight into the pathogenesis of chronic airway disease. murine; specific airway resistance; bronchial reactivity; forced oscillation technique; methacholine Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. M. Hoffman, Tufts Univ.'s Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, 200 Westboro Road, North Grafton, MA 01536 (e-mail: andrew.hoffman{at}tufts.edu )
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:8750-7587
1522-1601
DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00464.2006