Comparison of the automatic segmentation of multiple organs at risk in CT images of lung cancer between deep convolutional neural network-based and atlas-based techniques

• Published in: Acta oncologica Vol. 58; no. 2; p. 257
• Main Authors: Zhu, Jinhan, Zhang, Jun, Qiu, Bo, Liu, Yimei, Liu, Xiaowei, Chen, Lixin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-02-2019
• Subjects: Anatomy, Artistic; Atlases as Topic; Esophagus; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Lung Neoplasms - pathology; Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Neural Networks (Computer); Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging; Organs at Risk - pathology; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods; Radiography, Abdominal; Radiography, Thoracic; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Spine; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Tumor Burden
• ISSN: 1651-226X
• DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1529421

In this study, a deep convolutional neural network (CNN)-based automatic segmentation technique was applied to multiple organs at risk (OARs) depicted in computed tomography (CT) images of lung cancer patients, and the results were compared with those generated through atlas-based automatic segmentation.
An encoder-decoder U-Net neural network was produced. The trained deep CNN performed the automatic segmentation of CT images for 36 cases of lung cancer. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the mean surface distance (MSD) and the 95% Hausdorff distance (95% HD) were calculated, with manual segmentation results used as the standard, and were compared with the results obtained through atlas-based segmentation.
For the heart, lungs and liver, both the deep CNN-based and atlas-based techniques performed satisfactorily (average values: 0.87 < DSC < 0.95, 1.8 mm < MSD < 3.8 mm, 7.9 mm < 95% HD <11 mm). For the spinal cord and the oesophagus, the two methods had statistically significant differences. For the atlas-based technique, the average values were 0.54 < DSC < 0.71, 2.6 mm < MSD < 3.1 mm and 9.4 mm < 95% HD <12 mm. For the deep CNN-based technique, the average values were 0.71 < DSC < 0.79, 1.2 mm < MSD <2.2 mm and 4.0 mm < 95% HD < 7.9 mm.
Our results showed that automatic segmentation based on a deep convolutional neural network enabled us to complete automatic segmentation tasks rapidly. Deep convolutional neural networks can be satisfactorily adapted to segment OARs during radiation treatment planning for lung cancer patients.