Unilateral external fixator and its biomechanical effects in treating different types of femoral fracture: A finite element study with experimental validated model

• Published in: Heliyon Vol. 10; no. 4; p. e26660
• Main Authors: Abd Aziz, Aishah Umairah, Ammarullah, Muhammad Imam, Ng, Bing Wui, Gan, Hong-Seng, Abdul Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq, Ramlee, Muhammad Hanif
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 29-02-2024; Elsevier
• Subjects: External fixator; Femur; Finite element analysis; Fracture healing; Pin tract infection; Femur; Fracture healing; Pin tract infection; External fixator; Finite element analysis
• ISSN: 2405-8440; 2405-8440
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26660

Previous works had successfully demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of unilateral external fixator in treating various types of fracture, ranging from the simple type, such as oblique and transverse fractures, to complex fractures. However, literature that investigated its biomechanical analyses to further justify its efficacy is limited. Therefore, this paper aimed to analyse the stability of unilateral external fixator for treating different types of fracture, including the simple oblique, AO32C3 comminuted, and 20 mm gap transverse fracture. These fractures were reconstructed at the distal diaphysis of the femoral bone and computationally analysed through the finite element method under the stance phase condition. Findings showed a decrease in the fixation stiffness in large gap fracture (645.2 Nmm-1 for oblique and comminuted, while 23.4 Nmm-1 for the gap fracture), which resulted in higher displacement, IFM and stress distribution at the pin bone interface. These unfavourable conditions could consequently increase the risk of delayed union, pin loosening and infection, as well as implant failure. Nevertheless, the stress observed on the fracture surfaces was relatively low and in controlled amount, indicating that bone unity is still allowable in all models. Briefly, the unilateral fixation may provide desirable results in smaller fracture gap, but its usage in larger gap fracture might be alarming. These findings could serve as a guide and insight for surgeons and researchers, especially on the biomechanical stability of fixation in different fracture types and how will it affect bone unity.