Comparison of in vitro viability methods for Cryptosporidium oocysts

The water-borne protozoan parasite Cryptosporidium parvum forms oocysts that can persist for long periods of time in the environment, even though the sporozoites inside the oocysts may no longer be viable, making it difficult to assess the associated risk of infection. In this study, we compared the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental parasitology Vol. 187; pp. 30 - 36
Main Authors: Vande Burgt, Nathan H., Auer, Agathe, Zintl, Annetta
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-04-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The water-borne protozoan parasite Cryptosporidium parvum forms oocysts that can persist for long periods of time in the environment, even though the sporozoites inside the oocysts may no longer be viable, making it difficult to assess the associated risk of infection. In this study, we compared the ability of various in vitro methods to discriminate viable from non-viable oocysts, including excystation, DAPI/PI staining, RNA FISH, PMA-qPCR and a novel polymer slide adhesion method. With the notable exception of our in vitro excystation protocol, all methods were found to be useful for identifying viable oocysts. [Display omitted] •Excystation does not accurately assess the viability of Cryptosporidium oocysts.•DAPI/PI staining, RNA FISH, and PMA-qPCR discriminate viable and non-viable oocysts.•Live oocysts adhere preferentially to the polymer coated Nexterion Slide P.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0014-4894
1090-2449
DOI:10.1016/j.exppara.2018.03.002