A comparison of thoracic CT and abdominal CT for the identification of thoracic blunt trauma

Abstract Background In light of current trends to limit radiation exposure and costs, as well as increased traffic safety, computed tomography (CT) may have decreasing value for evaluating patients with blunt trauma. The authors examined the utility of chest x-ray and abdominal CT for identifying cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery Vol. 204; no. 6; pp. 927 - 932
Main Authors: Pinette, William, B.S, Barrios, Cristobal, M.D, Pham, Jacqueline, B.S, Kong, Allen, M.D, Dolich, Matthew, M.D, Lekawa, Michael, M.D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-12-2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background In light of current trends to limit radiation exposure and costs, as well as increased traffic safety, computed tomography (CT) may have decreasing value for evaluating patients with blunt trauma. The authors examined the utility of chest x-ray and abdominal CT for identifying clinically significant thoracic blunt trauma. Methods In this prospective study, findings on thoracic CT, abdominal CT, and chest x-ray from trauma patients were compared to assess injury prevalence and relevance to treatment outcomes. Results Four hundred forty-four patients were identified, of whom 76% had no findings. Occult findings had significantly lower Injury Severity Scores. All clinically relevant pneumothoraces and most other injuries could be identified without thoracic CT. Two of 3 aortic abnormalities were suspected from chest x-ray. Conclusions Clinically significant injuries can be identified with abdominal CT and chest x-ray, safely allowing reductions in radiation exposure, hospital stays, and costs by limiting the use of thoracic CT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.002