Montreal–Toulouse Language Assessment Battery: Evidence of criterion validity from patients with aphasia

Abstract Background The Montreal–Toulouse Language Assessment Battery — Brazilian version (MTL-BR) provides a general description of language processing and related components in adults with brain injury. Objective The present study aimed at verifying the criterion-related validity of the Montreal–T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the neurological sciences Vol. 357; no. 1; pp. 246 - 251
Main Authors: Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso, Ortiz, Karin Zazo, Barreto, Simone dos Santos, Pimenta Parente, Maria Alice de Mattos, Nespoulous, Jean-Luc, Joanette, Yves, Fonseca, Rochele Paz
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15-10-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background The Montreal–Toulouse Language Assessment Battery — Brazilian version (MTL-BR) provides a general description of language processing and related components in adults with brain injury. Objective The present study aimed at verifying the criterion-related validity of the Montreal–Toulouse Language Assessment Battery — Brazilian version (MTL-BR) by assessing its ability to discriminate between individuals with unilateral brain damage with and without aphasia. Methods The investigation was carried out in a Brazilian community-based sample of 104 adults, divided into four groups: 26 participants with left hemisphere damage (LHD) with aphasia, 25 participants with right hemisphere damage (RHD), 28 with LHD non-aphasic, and 25 healthy adults. Results There were significant differences between patients with aphasia and the other groups on most total and subtotal scores on MTL-BR tasks. Conclusions The results showed strong criterion-related validity evidence for the MTL-BR Battery, and provided important information regarding hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric cooperation. Future research is required to search for additional evidence of sensitivity, specificity and validity of the MTL-BR in samples with different types of aphasia and degrees of language impairment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-510X
1878-5883
DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2015.07.045