The effects of VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 ligands on angiogenic responses and left ventricular function in mice

Aims Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their receptors (VEGF-Rs) are among the most powerful factors regulating vascular growth. However, it has remained unknown whether stimulation of VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2 or both of the receptors produces the best angiogenic responses in myocardium. The a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cardiovascular research Vol. 86; no. 1; pp. 122 - 130
Main Authors: Huusko, Jenni, Merentie, Mari, Dijkstra, Marike H., Ryhänen, Minttu-Maria, Karvinen, Henna, Rissanen, Tuomas T., Vanwildemeersch, Maarten, Hedman, Marja, Lipponen, Jukka, Heinonen, Suvi E., Eriksson, Ulf, Shibuya, Masabumi, Ylä-Herttuala, Seppo
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-04-2010
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their receptors (VEGF-Rs) are among the most powerful factors regulating vascular growth. However, it has remained unknown whether stimulation of VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2 or both of the receptors produces the best angiogenic responses in myocardium. The aim of this study was to compare the VEGF-R1-specific ligand VEGF-B186, VEGF-R2-specific ligand VEGF-E and VEGF-A165, which stimulates both receptors, regarding their effects on angiogenesis and left ventricular function in mice. Methods and results High-resolution echocardiography was used to guide the closed-chest injections of adenoviral (Ad) vectors expressing VEGF-B186, VEGF-E, and VEGF-A165 into the anterior wall of the left ventricle in C57Bl/6J mice. Angiogenic and functional effects were analysed using histology, ultrasound and perfusion analyses 6 (D6) and 14 (D14) days after the Ad injection. AdVEGF-A165 induced a strong angiogenic response seen as an enlargement of myocardial capillaries whereas angiogenesis induced by AdVEGF-B186 and AdVEGF-E seemed more physiological. The increase in the capillary area was accompanied with an increase in myocardial perfusion at D6 after the gene injection. AdVEGF-A165 and AdVEGF-E induced endothelial-specific proliferation whereas AdVEGF-B186 mostly induced proliferation of cardiomyocytes. AdVEGF-A165 induced more pronounced tissue damage than AdVEGF-B186 and AdVEGF-E. Left ventricular function measured as ejection fraction did not change during the follow-up. AdVEGF-A165 increased both VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 protein expression whereas AdVEGF-B186 and AdVEGF-E did not affect endogenous receptor expression levels. Conclusion AdVEGF-B186 and AdVEGF-E are equally potent in inducing therapeutic angiogenesis in mouse myocardium and produce less side effects than AdVEGF-A165.
Bibliography:istex:88EEA6D198081105C60AA8B4CEB1A8ED5E8ECAA4
ark:/67375/HXZ-4WHQQK12-J
ArticleID:cvp382
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0008-6363
1755-3245
1755-3245
DOI:10.1093/cvr/cvp382