Sensory Characteristics of Soymilk and Tofu Made from Lipoxygenase-Free and Normal Soybeans
ABSTRACT Soymilk made from lipoxygenase‐free soybeans had less cooked beany aroma, less cooked beany flavor and less astringency and was rated darker and more yellow than that made from soybeans with normal lipoxygenase. Sensory descriptive panelists noted no differences between lipoxygenase‐free an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of food science Vol. 63; no. 6; pp. 1084 - 1087 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-11-1998
Institute of Food Technologists Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Soymilk made from lipoxygenase‐free soybeans had less cooked beany aroma, less cooked beany flavor and less astringency and was rated darker and more yellow than that made from soybeans with normal lipoxygenase. Sensory descriptive panelists noted no differences between lipoxygenase‐free and normal soybeans for milky flavor, wheat flavor, thickness, chalkiness or aftertaste. Tofu made from lipoxygenase‐free soybeans had less cooked beany flavor than that made from normal soybeans. There were no differences in cooked beany aroma, raw beany aroma, raw beany flavor, wheat flavor, astringency, hardness, darkness or yellowness. Native‐born Japanese, Chinese and U.S. descriptive panelists differed in responses to flavor, texture and color of soymilk and tofu. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JFDS1084 istex:C005026165D9DC9F4B9A92FA609A184755F7DD62 ark:/67375/WNG-JLVN7R4V-H Journal Paper No. J‐17625 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, IA, Project Nos. 3362 and 3107 supported by Hatch Act funds. We also acknowledge financial support from the State of Iowa, the Iowa Soybean Promotion Board, and the Center for Crops Utilization Research, Iowa State University for production and sensory evaluation facilities. |
ISSN: | 0022-1147 1750-3841 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb15860.x |