Factors among patients receiving prone positioning for the acute respiratory distress syndrome found useful for predicting mortality in the intensive care unit

• Published in: Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 1 - 5
• Main Authors: Modrykamien, Ariel M., Daoud, Yahya
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Taylor & Francis 2018; Taylor & Francis Group LLC; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Adult respiratory distress syndrome; Care and treatment; Critical care medicine; Intensive care; Mechanical ventilation; Methods; Mortality; Original Research; Patient outcomes; prone positioning; Respiratory distress syndrome; Ventilation; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; mechanical ventilation; prone positioning
• ISSN: 0899-8280; 1525-3252
• DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2017.1391560

Optimal mechanical ventilation management in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) involves the use of low tidal volumes and limited plateau pressure. Refractory hypoxemia may not respond to this strategy, requiring other interventions. The use of prone positioning in severe ARDS resulted in improvement in 28-day survival. To determine whether mechanical ventilation strategies or other parameters affected survival in patients undergoing prone positioning, a retrospective analysis was conducted of a consecutive series of patients with severe ARDS treated with prone positioning. Demographic and clinical information involving mechanical ventilation strategies, as well as other variables associated with prone positioning, was collected. The rate of in-hospital mortality was obtained, and previously described parameters were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Forty-three patients with severe ARDS were treated with prone positioning, and 27 (63%) died in the intensive care unit. Only three parameters were significant predictors of survival: APACHE II score (P = 0.03), plateau pressure (P = 0.02), and driving pressure (P = 0.04). The ability of each of these parameters to predict mortality was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves. The area under the curve values for APACHE II, plateau pressure, and driving pressure were 0.74, 0.69, and 0.67, respectively. In conclusion, in a group of patients with severe ARDS treated with prone positioning, only APACHE II, plateau pressure, and driving pressure were associated with mortality in the intensive care unit.