Push-out Bond Strength of Injectable Pozzolan-based Root Canal Sealer

Abstract Introduction The present study aimed to rank the bond strength to root dentin of a new injectable pozzolan-based root canal sealer, EndoSeal MTA, as compared with MTA Fillapex and AH Plus. Methods Eighteen dentinal slices (1 ± 0.1 mm) were obtained from the middle third of 6 maxillary incis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of endodontics Vol. 42; no. 11; pp. 1656 - 1659
Main Authors: Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal, DDS, MSc, PhD, Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi, DDS, MSc, Prado, Marina C., DDS, MSc, Zanon, Mayara, DDS, Senna, Plinio Mendes, DDS, MSc, PhD, Souza, Erick M., DDS, MSc, PhD, De-Deus, Gustavo, DDS, MSc, PhD
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-11-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction The present study aimed to rank the bond strength to root dentin of a new injectable pozzolan-based root canal sealer, EndoSeal MTA, as compared with MTA Fillapex and AH Plus. Methods Eighteen dentinal slices (1 ± 0.1 mm) were obtained from the middle third of 6 maxillary incisors previously selected. Three canal-like holes with 0.8 mm diameter were drilled perpendicularly on the axial surface of each slice. Then, a standardized irrigation was applied for all holes that were subsequently filled with 1 of 3 test root canal sealers. After that, slices were stored in contact with phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH 7.2) for 7 days at 37°C before the push-out assay. Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed rank test with a Bonferroni correction were used to rank the results. Significance boundary was set at α = 5%. Results Friedman test confirmed a significant dissimilarity in push-out ranks among the tested cements ( P  < .01). Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated AH Plus had significant superior resistance to dislodgment compared with Endo Seal ( P  < .01) or MTA Fillapex ( P  < .01), whereas MTA Fillapex presented the lowest push-out values as compared with Endo Seal ( P  < .01) or AH Plus ( P  < .01). Conclusions EndoSeal presents satisfactory bond strength performance for application in endodontic therapy compared with MTA Fillapex, and although it displays a new alternative of injectable bio-tight root canal sealer, it is not able to improve adhesion compared with AH Plus.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0099-2399
1878-3554
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.009