Upper extremity lymphatic function at rest and during exercise in breast cancer survivors with and without lymphedema compared with healthy controls

Departments of 1 Medicine, 2 Human Kinetics, and 3 Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Submitted 16 January 2007 ; accepted in final form 15 June 2007 Lymphoscintigraphy was used to measure lymphatic function at rest and during exercise in breast cancer sur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 103; no. 3; pp. 917 - 925
Main Authors: Lane, Kirstin N, Dolan, Lianne B, Worsley, Dan, McKenzie, Don C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Bethesda, MD Am Physiological Soc 01-09-2007
American Physiological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Departments of 1 Medicine, 2 Human Kinetics, and 3 Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Submitted 16 January 2007 ; accepted in final form 15 June 2007 Lymphoscintigraphy was used to measure lymphatic function at rest and during exercise in breast cancer survivors with lymphedema (BCRL, n = 10), breast cancer survivors (BC, n = 10), and controls (Cont, n = 10). After injection of 99m Tc-antimony colloid to the hands, subjects rested or performed 12 repeated sets of arm cranking for 2.5 min at 0.6 W/kg followed by 2.5 min of rest. One-minute spot views were taken with a gamma-radiation camera immediately postinjection and every 10 min over 60 min to calculate clearance rate. As well, an upper body scan was taken at 65 min postinjection to measure radiopharmaceutical uptake in the axilla (Ax) and forearm (Fore). All groups displayed similar increases in clearance rate with exercise ( P = 0.000). Ax significantly increased with exercise in Cont only [Cont: (mean ± SD) 4.9 ± 2.6 vs. 7.9 ± 4.2%, P = 0.000; BCRL: 1.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.7 ± 2.1%, P = 0.531; BC: 3.9 ± 3.4 vs. 5.2 ± 3.2%, P = 0.130], whereas Fore, indicating dermal backflow, significantly increased in BCRL only (BCRL: 2.4 ± 0.87 vs. 4.4 ± 2.0%, P = 0.004; BC: 1.1 ± 0.25 vs. 1.1 ± 0.31%, P = 0.784; Cont: 0.93 ± 0.26 vs. 1.0 ± 0.20%, P = 0.296). The results indicate that, in women with BCRL, exercise causes radiopharmaceuticals to clear from the hand at the same rate as BC and Cont, but, instead of reaching the axilla, a greater amount of activity gets trapped in the dermis of the forearm. BC, meanwhile, have similar lymphatic function as Cont; however, there is a highly variable response that may suggest that some BC subjects may be at risk for developing lymphedema. lymphoscintigraphy Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. N. Lane, Division of Sports Medicine, Univ. of British Columbia, 3055 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3 (e-mail: klane{at}interchange.ubc.ca )
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:8750-7587
1522-1601
DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00077.2007