Association of Insurance Status with Severity and Management in ED Patients with Asthma Exacerbation

• Published in: The western journal of emergency medicine Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 22 - 27
• Main Authors: Hasegawa, Kohei, Stoll, Samantha J, Ahn, Jason, Kysia, Rashid F, Sullivan, Ashley F, Camargo, Jr, Carlos A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 01-01-2016; eScholarship Publishing, University of California
• Subjects: Acute asthma; Ambulatory Care; Anti-Asthmatic Agents - therapeutic use; Asthma - economics; Asthma - epidemiology; Asthma - physiopathology; Disparity; Emergency Department Access; Emergency Service, Hospital - economics; Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization; Emergency Treatment - economics; Emergency Treatment - utilization; Evidence-Based Practice; Healthcare Disparities - statistics & numerical data; Hospitalization; Humans; Insurance; Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data; Management; Policy Making; Public Health; Race; Severity; Severity of Illness Index; United States - epidemiology
• ISSN: 1936-900X; 1936-9018
• DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2015.11.28715

Previous studies have demonstrated an association of low socioeconomic status with frequent asthma exacerbations. However, there have been no recent multicenter efforts to examine the relationship of insurance status - a proxy for socioeconomic status - with asthma severity and management in adults. The objective is to investigate chronic and acute asthma management disparities by insurance status among adults requiring emergency department (ED) treatment in the United States.
We conducted a multicenter chart review study (48 EDs in 23 U.S. states) on ED patients, aged 18-54 years, with acute asthma between 2011 and 2012. Each site underwent training (lecture, practice charts, certification) before reviewing randomly selected charts. We categorized patients into three groups based on their primary health insurance: private, public, and no insurance. Outcome measures were chronic asthma severity (as measured by ≥2 ED visits in one-year period) and management prior to the index ED visit, acute asthma management in the ED, and prescription at ED discharge.
The analytic cohort comprised 1,928 ED patients with acute asthma. Among these, 33% had private insurance, 40% had public insurance, and 27% had no insurance. Compared to patients with private insurance, those with public insurance or no insurance were more likely to have ≥2 ED visits during the preceding year (35%, 49%, and 45%, respectively; p<0.001). Despite the higher chronic severity, those with no insurance were less likely to have guideline-recommended chronic asthma care - i.e., lower use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS [41%, 41%, and 29%; p<0.001]) and asthma specialist care (9%, 10%, and 4%; p<0.001). By contrast, there were no significant differences in acute asthma management in the ED - e.g., use of systemic corticosteroids (75%, 79%, and 78%; p=0.08) or initiation of ICS at ED discharge (12%, 12%, and 14%; p=0.57) - by insurance status.
In this multicenter observational study of ED patients with acute asthma, we found significant discrepancies in chronic asthma severity and management by insurance status. By contrast, there were no differences in acute asthma management among the insurance groups.