COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among youth

The purpose of this evaluation is to describe COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among a sample of youth aged 12-15 and inform efforts to increase vaccination uptake among youth populations. We used data collected in May 2021 through a health education program for 9 graders (N = 345). We used Spearman corre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics Vol. 17; no. 12; pp. 5013 - 5015
Main Authors: Willis, Don E, Presley, Jessica, Williams, Mark, Zaller, Nickolas, McElfish, Pearl A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Taylor & Francis 02-12-2021
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this evaluation is to describe COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among a sample of youth aged 12-15 and inform efforts to increase vaccination uptake among youth populations. We used data collected in May 2021 through a health education program for 9 graders (N = 345). We used Spearman correlations and chi-square tests to assess the statistical significance of bivariate relationships. Less than half of students (42%) reported they are not hesitant at all about getting a COVID-19 vaccine. The remainder reported they were "a little hesitant" (22%), "somewhat hesitant" (21%), or "very hesitant" (15%). There were no statistically significant differences across age, gender, race/ethnicity, parental education, self-reported grades, or hours playing video games during school days. There was a statistically significant relationship between COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and hours of TV watched during school days. The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in this sample is high, but more research is needed to estimate its prevalence for youth at the state or national level. Correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adult populations may not match those found in youth populations. Research which recognizes youth as agentic rather than passive participants in decision-making opens opportunities for developing age-appropriate health communication and interventions for vaccination.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2164-5515
2164-554X
DOI:10.1080/21645515.2021.1989923