OSU-CG5, a novel energy restriction mimetic agent, targets human colorectal cancer cells in vitro

Aim: Energy-restriction mimetic agents (ERMAs) are small-molecule agents that target various aspects of energy metabolism, which has emerged as a promising approach in cancer therapy. In the current study, we tested the ability of OSU-CGS, a novel ERMA, to tar- get human colorectal cancer (CRC) in v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta pharmacologica Sinica Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 394 - 400
Main Authors: Arafa, El-shaimaa A, Abdelazeem, Ahmed H, Arab, Hany H, Omar, Hany A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01-03-2014
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim: Energy-restriction mimetic agents (ERMAs) are small-molecule agents that target various aspects of energy metabolism, which has emerged as a promising approach in cancer therapy. In the current study, we tested the ability of OSU-CGS, a novel ERMA, to tar- get human colorectal cancer (CRC) in vitro. Methods: Two human CRC cell lines (HCT-116 and Caco-2) were tested. Cell viability was assessed using MTT assay. Caspase-3/7 activities were measured using Caspase-GIo 3/7 assay kit. Western blot analysis was used to measure the expression of relevant pro- teins in the cells. Glucose consumption of the cells was detected using glucose uptake cell-based assay kit. Results: OSU-CG5 dose-dependently inhibited HCT-116 and Caco-2 cell proliferation with the ICso values of 3.9 and 4.6 μmol/L, respec- tively, which were 20-25-fold lower than those of resveratrol, a reference ERMA. Both OSU-CG5 (5, 10, and 20 μmol/L) and resvera- trol (50, 100, and 200 μmol/L) dose-dependently increased caspase-3/7 activity and PARP level in the cells. Furthermore, both OSU- CG5 and resveratrol induced dose-dependent energy restriction in the cells: they suppressed glucose uptake and Akt phosphoryla- tion, decreased the levels of p-mTOR and p-pTOS6K, increased the levels of ER stress response proteins GRP78 and GADD153, and increased the level of β-TrCP, which led to the downregulation of cyclin D1 and Spl. Conclusion: OSU-CG5 exhibits promising anti-cancer activity against human CRC cells in vitro, which was, at least in part, due to energy restriction and the consequent induction of ER stress and apoptosis.
Bibliography:colorectal cancer; energy restriction mimetic agent; OSU-CG5; resveratrol; apoptosis; glucose uptake; Akt; mTOR; ER stress;β-TrCP
Aim: Energy-restriction mimetic agents (ERMAs) are small-molecule agents that target various aspects of energy metabolism, which has emerged as a promising approach in cancer therapy. In the current study, we tested the ability of OSU-CGS, a novel ERMA, to tar- get human colorectal cancer (CRC) in vitro. Methods: Two human CRC cell lines (HCT-116 and Caco-2) were tested. Cell viability was assessed using MTT assay. Caspase-3/7 activities were measured using Caspase-GIo 3/7 assay kit. Western blot analysis was used to measure the expression of relevant pro- teins in the cells. Glucose consumption of the cells was detected using glucose uptake cell-based assay kit. Results: OSU-CG5 dose-dependently inhibited HCT-116 and Caco-2 cell proliferation with the ICso values of 3.9 and 4.6 μmol/L, respec- tively, which were 20-25-fold lower than those of resveratrol, a reference ERMA. Both OSU-CG5 (5, 10, and 20 μmol/L) and resvera- trol (50, 100, and 200 μmol/L) dose-dependently increased caspase-3/7 activity and PARP level in the cells. Furthermore, both OSU- CG5 and resveratrol induced dose-dependent energy restriction in the cells: they suppressed glucose uptake and Akt phosphoryla- tion, decreased the levels of p-mTOR and p-pTOS6K, increased the levels of ER stress response proteins GRP78 and GADD153, and increased the level of β-TrCP, which led to the downregulation of cyclin D1 and Spl. Conclusion: OSU-CG5 exhibits promising anti-cancer activity against human CRC cells in vitro, which was, at least in part, due to energy restriction and the consequent induction of ER stress and apoptosis.
31-1347/R
ISSN:1671-4083
1745-7254
DOI:10.1038/aps.2013.183