Evidence-based management of hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Other definitions have been employed: (1) Tien et al [2] defined massive postoperative bleeding as the need for relaparotomy or transcatheter embolization to stop the bleeding; (2) Choi et al [3] defined delayed hemorrhage as bleeding from the surgical site requiring greater than 2 units of packed r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery Vol. 194; no. 1; pp. 10 - 12
Main Author: Ellison, Edwin Christopher, M.D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-07-2007
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Other definitions have been employed: (1) Tien et al [2] defined massive postoperative bleeding as the need for relaparotomy or transcatheter embolization to stop the bleeding; (2) Choi et al [3] defined delayed hemorrhage as bleeding from the surgical site requiring greater than 2 units of packed red cells, surgical intensive care unit supervision, laparotomy, or transarterial embolization 5 days or more after pancreaticoduodenectomy; (3) de Castro et al [4] defined this complication as postoperative bleeding occurring 24 hours after the index operation requiring a transfusion need of at least 4 units; and (4) Koukoutsis et al [5] defined massive hemorrhage as a drop in arterial pressure of 40 mm Hg or more and the administration of at least 2 units of blood during resuscitation. First bleeding may be gastrointestinal, also termed intraluminal or intra-abdominal.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.034