Evidence-based management of hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy
Other definitions have been employed: (1) Tien et al [2] defined massive postoperative bleeding as the need for relaparotomy or transcatheter embolization to stop the bleeding; (2) Choi et al [3] defined delayed hemorrhage as bleeding from the surgical site requiring greater than 2 units of packed r...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery Vol. 194; no. 1; pp. 10 - 12 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01-07-2007
Elsevier Elsevier Limited |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Other definitions have been employed: (1) Tien et al [2] defined massive postoperative bleeding as the need for relaparotomy or transcatheter embolization to stop the bleeding; (2) Choi et al [3] defined delayed hemorrhage as bleeding from the surgical site requiring greater than 2 units of packed red cells, surgical intensive care unit supervision, laparotomy, or transarterial embolization 5 days or more after pancreaticoduodenectomy; (3) de Castro et al [4] defined this complication as postoperative bleeding occurring 24 hours after the index operation requiring a transfusion need of at least 4 units; and (4) Koukoutsis et al [5] defined massive hemorrhage as a drop in arterial pressure of 40 mm Hg or more and the administration of at least 2 units of blood during resuscitation. First bleeding may be gastrointestinal, also termed intraluminal or intra-abdominal. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Other Sources-1 content type line 63 ObjectType-Editorial-2 ObjectType-Commentary-1 |
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.034 |