Generalism and the evolution of parasite virulence

•Support for the virulence trade-off theory is good but not perfect.•Parasites differ in their degree of host generalism.•Generalism is likely to impact virulence in four ways.•Incorporation of infectivity data may lead to better predictions of evolved virulence. The evolution of parasite-imposed ho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) Vol. 28; no. 10; pp. 592 - 596
Main Authors: Leggett, Helen C., Buckling, Angus, Long, Gráinne H., Boots, Mike
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01-10-2013
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Support for the virulence trade-off theory is good but not perfect.•Parasites differ in their degree of host generalism.•Generalism is likely to impact virulence in four ways.•Incorporation of infectivity data may lead to better predictions of evolved virulence. The evolution of parasite-imposed host harm (virulence) will be affected by numerous factors, not least the range of hosts that parasites can infect. Here, we consider four ways that parasite host range (generalism) might directly affect observed levels of parasite virulence: costs of generalism, multiplicity of infection, maladaptive virulence, and host availability. Integrating parasite infectivity range with life-history evolution will generate novel general hypotheses for the evolutionary ecology of virulence, as well as explicit predictions about the virulence of emerging diseases resulting from host shifts.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.002
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-5347
1872-8383
DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.002