Effects of ice number concentration on dynamics of a shallow mixed-phase stratiform cloud

• Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research Vol. 116; no. D1
• Main Authors: Ovchinnikov, Mikhail, Korolev, Alexei, Fan, Jiwen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington Blackwell Publishing Ltd 17-09-2011
• Subjects: Arctic boundary layer; Atmospheric sciences; Buoyancy; buoyancy flux; cloud modeling; Clouds; Cooling; crystal depositional growth; Fluctuations; Geophysics; Heat transfer; Ice; ice sedimentation; Latent heat; Meteorology; mixed-phase microphysics; Radiation
• ISSN: 0148-0227; 2169-897X; 2156-2202; 2169-8996
• DOI: 10.1029/2011JD015888

Previous modeling studies have shown high sensitivity of mixed‐phase clouds to ice number concentration, Ni, with simulated clouds often transitioning from mixed‐phase to ice‐only regime within a narrow range of Ni. To better understand the mechanisms behind this transition, we analyze several simulations of a mixed‐phase stratiform Arctic cloud observed on 26 April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi‐Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC). In the BASE run, Ni is constrained to match the measured value and a persistent mixed‐phase cloud is formed, with properties similar to those observed. When Ni is quadrupled (HI_ICE) the liquid water path is reduced by half within two hours. The changes in liquid water are accompanied by diminishing radiative cooling and slowing vertical mixing, exposing complex interactions among microphysics, radiation and dynamics. Deviations of BASE and HI_ICE from a simulation without ice are used to explore the linearity of the model response to variation in Ni. It is shown that early changes in cloud condensate amount and radiative cooling rate are proportional to Ni, while changes in the vertical buoyancy flux and dynamics are qualitatively different in HI_ICE compared to BASE. The nonlinear (with respect to Ni) reduction in buoyancy flux drives the initial response of the mixed layer dynamics to the appearance of ice and subsequently determines the sustainability of liquid water in the cloud in this case. Two additional sensitivity experiments link the decreased buoyancy production to the latent heat release from the depositional ice growth while confirming the importance of the cloud‐radiation feedback.
Key Points
Arctic mixed‐phase stratus clouds are very sensitive to ice number concentration
Initial liquid water and radiative flux responses to ice number are linear
Early changes in cloud structure are from ice effects on buoyancy flux profile