Atypical primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma: multiparametric differentiation based on non-enhancing volume, apparent diffusion coefficient, and arterial spin labeling

Objectives To evaluate the multiparametric diagnostic performance with non-enhancing tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and arterial spin labeling (ASL) to differentiate between atypical primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM). Methods One hundred and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European radiology Vol. 33; no. 8; pp. 5357 - 5367
Main Authors: Yu, Xiaojun, Hong, Weiping, Ye, Minting, Lai, Mingyao, Shi, Changzheng, Li, Linzhen, Ye, Kunlin, Xu, Jiali, Ai, Ruyu, Shan, Changguo, Cai, Linbo, Luo, Liangping
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-08-2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives To evaluate the multiparametric diagnostic performance with non-enhancing tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and arterial spin labeling (ASL) to differentiate between atypical primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM). Methods One hundred and fifty-eight patients with pathologically confirmed typical PCNSL ( n  = 59), atypical PCNSL (hemorrhage, necrosis, or heterogeneous contrast enhancement, n  = 29), and GBM ( n  = 70) were selected. Relative minimum ADC (rADC min ), mean (rADC mean ), maximum (rADC max ), and rADC max-min (rADC dif ) were obtained by standardization of the contralateral white matter. Maximum cerebral blood flow (CBF max ) was obtained according to the ASL-CBF map. The regions of interests (ROIs) were manually delineated on the inner side of the tumor to further generate a 3D-ROI and obtain the non-enhancing tumor (nET) volume. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Results Atypical PCNSLs showed significantly lower rADC max , rADC mean , and rADC dif than that of GBMs. GBMs showed significantly higher CBF max and nET volume ratios than that of atypical PCNSLs. Combined three-variable models with rADC mean , CBF max , and nET volume ratio were superior to one- and two-variable models. The AUC of the three-variable model was 0.96, and the sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 96.55%, respectively. Conclusion The combined evaluation of rADC mean , CBF max , and nET volume allowed for reliable differentiation between atypical PCNSL and GBM. Key Points • Atypical PCNSL is easily misdiagnosed as glioblastoma, which leads to unnecessary surgical resection. • The nET volume, ADC, and ASL-derived parameter (CBF) were lower for atypical PCNSL than that for glioblastoma. • The combination of multiple parameters performed well (AUC = 0.96) in the discrimination between atypical PCNSL and glioblastoma.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1432-1084
0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-023-09681-2