Variabilities of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Long-acting Engine, Anisotropic Jet, or Many Fluctuating Regions?
We show that simple kinematic arguments can give limits on the timescale and amplitude of variabilities in gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows, especially when the variability timescale is shorter than the observed time since the burst, t < t. These limits help us to identify the sources of afterglo...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Astrophysical journal Vol. 631; no. 1; pp. 429 - 434 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chicago, IL
IOP Publishing
20-09-2005
University of Chicago Press |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We show that simple kinematic arguments can give limits on the timescale and amplitude of variabilities in gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows, especially when the variability timescale is shorter than the observed time since the burst, t < t. These limits help us to identify the sources of afterglow variability. The afterglows of GRB 011211 and GRB 021004 marginally violate these limits. If such violation is confirmed by the Swift satellite, a possible explanation is that (1) the compact objects that power GRB jets continue to eject an intermittent outflow for a very long timescale (> 1 day), (2) the GRB jet from the central engine has a temporal anisotropy with a large brightness contrast > 10 and small angular structure < 10 super(-2), or (3) many (> 10 super(3)) regions fluctuate simultaneously in the emitting site. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
DOI: | 10.1086/432567 |