Development and validation of a pharmacist-led education model in allergic rhinitis management: a multi-phase study

• Published in: Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 1 - 116
• Main Authors: Chew, Chii-Chii, Lim, Xin-Jie, Letchumanan, Pathma, Narayanan, Maithrea Suresh, Rajan, Philip, Chong, Chee Ping
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 04-10-2023; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Agreements; Allergens; Allergies; Analysis; Asthma; Clinical medicine; Clinical practice guidelines; Delphi method; Disease management; Drug stores; Drugstores; Educational films; Hay fever; Health care industry; Likert scale; Otolaryngology; Patient education; Pharmacists; Pharmacy; Physicians; Practice guidelines (Medicine); Quality of life; Questionnaires; Respiratory diseases; Response rates; Rhinitis; Strategic planning (Business); Malaysia
• ISSN: 2052-3211; 2052-3211
• DOI: 10.1186/s40545-023-00625-1

Background Patient education is identified as one of the core and fundamental management strategies in the management of allergic rhinitis. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines developed guidance for the management of allergic respiratory disease, and the guidelines are applicable to the international context. The ARIA guidelines for the pharmacy have specifically encouraged the creation of local pharmacist-led intervention in allergic rhinitis management. This study aims to develop a pharmacist-led educational model using a multi-phase study approach. Method In phase one, we conducted a literature review using four databases to extract relevant articles and clinical practice guidelines published between 2017 and 2022. The information was structured into a questionnaire consisting of patient education material (10 domains with 130 items) and pharmacist counseling scopes (15 domains with 43 items), with each item having a rating scale ranging from 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest) level of agreement. Fifty-two panellists, including otorhinolaryngologists and pharmacists, were invited to complete the questionnaire. A consensus agreement was considered when at least 70% of panellists scored 7 to 9 (critically important). A two-round survey was conducted, and descriptive analysis, inter-rater reliability ([greater than or equal to] 0.5-1 indicate moderate to excellent reliability), variation in the relative interquartile (VRIR < 0.3 indicate good stability), and variation in the coefficient of variation (VCV < 40% considered consensus achieved) were performed. In phase two, patient education material was developed into audio-visual format, and in phase three, patients rated its understandability and actionability using a validated Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. Results In the round one Delphi survey, 43 panellists responded, with 171 out of 173 items achieving "consensus agreement" (75.4-100%). In the second survey, 32 out of 43 panellists responded, with most items (171 out of 173 items) stable across rounds and all items had acceptable internal consistency (VCV: - 12.21-15.81). Two items did not achieve "consensus agreement" (64%) but improved in round two (92.9%), however, instability was observed (VRIR: 0.36). These two items were retained in the model due to achieving the minimum level of agreement and internal consistency (VCV = 15.81). Inter-rater reliability was 0.608 and 0.970 in the respective rounds. Patients rated the educational material as understandable (81.8-100%) and actionable (100%). Conclusion The validated pharmacist-led education model, with its educational materials tested on end-users, provides structured patient education and pharmaceutical care in assisting patients with allergic rhinitis. The educational material allows the delivery of standardized information by the healthcare providers to the patients. Further research on the effectiveness of this model in improving patients' symptom control and quality of life is warranted. Keywords: Rhinitis, Allergic, Pharmacist, Education, Pharmaceutical services