Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses: Optimal Materials for the Optimal Stomatognathic System Performance-Preliminary Study

The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Prostheses against other treatment modalities regarding the jaw kinematics. Six patients with Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses, four with mandibular ramus Patient-Specific Implant (PSI) with condylar hea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of functional biomaterials Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 7
Main Authors: Niedzielska, Iwona, Bąk, Michał, Niedzielski, Damian, Okła, Hubert, Gabor, Jadwiga, Stanula, Arkadiusz, Paluch, Jarosław, Swinarew, Andrzej Szymon
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 26-01-2021
MDPI
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Prostheses against other treatment modalities regarding the jaw kinematics. Six patients with Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses, four with mandibular ramus Patient-Specific Implant (PSI) with condylar head preservation, and four after mandibular condylectomy were evaluated by the means of axiography (Cadiax Compact 2), which is the noninvasive three-dimensional study of condylar movements. The patients were also evaluated clinically for the mandibular movements. The study revealed that the significant movement limitations occurred bilaterally in patients fitted with TMJ prosthesis. For the protrusion movement, the vector length of the movement (L) for the TMJ prosthesis was 0.31 vs. 3.01 mm for the PSI (Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 9.1667, df = 2, -value = 0.01022, post hoc Dunn -value = 0.015) and for the laterotrusion to the operated side, the length of the vector (L) was 0.66 vs. 3.35 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences between groups were most frequent for the laterotrusion to the unoperated side. The study shows that a further development on TMJ Prostheses geometry and materials is needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2079-4983
2079-4983
DOI:10.3390/jfb12010007