Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine and Lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (Cituxumumab) in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy: NCCTG N0733 (Alliance)
Purpose To compare efficacy and safety of capecitabine and lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (cituxumumab) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab. Patients and methods Following an initial safety run-in cohort, patients were randomized 1:2 t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Breast cancer research and treatment Vol. 188; no. 2; pp. 477 - 487 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Springer US
01-07-2021
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
To compare efficacy and safety of capecitabine and lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (cituxumumab) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab.
Patients and methods
Following an initial safety run-in cohort, patients were randomized 1:2 to Arm A (capecitabine and lapatinib) or to Arm B (capecitabine, lapatinib, and cituxumumab). Given the frequency of non-hematologic grade ≥ 3 adverse events in those receiving the three-drug combination in the safety cohort, lapatinib and capecitabine doses were reduced in Arm B only. The primary objective was to determine if the addition of cituxumumab to capecitabine and lapatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine and lapatinib. Secondary objectives included a comparison between arms of other clinical endpoints, safety, change in overall quality of life (QOL) and self-assessed fatigue, rash, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome.
Results
From July 2008 to March 2012, 68 patients (out of 142 planned) were enrolled and 63 were evaluable, including 8 for the safety run-in and 55 for the randomized cohort. Study enrollment was stopped early due to slow accrual. The addition of cituxumumab to capecitabine and lapatinib did not improve PFS (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.52–1.64). Furthermore, no difference in objective response rate or overall survival (OS) was observed. No difference between arms was observed in grade ≥ 3 adverse events, overall QOL change from baseline after 4 cycles of treatment.
Conclusion
The addition of cituxumumab to lapatinib and capecitabine did not improve PFS or OS compared with lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive MBC.
Clinical trial registry
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00684983 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Author Contributions: Paul Haluska, Karla Ballman, Amylou Dueck, and Beiyun Chen contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis, and interpretation of results were performed by Tufia Haddad, Jun He, Kathleen Tenner, and Amylou Dueck. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Tufia Haddad with critical review and support by Ciara O’Sullivan and Jun He. Donald Northfelt, Hannah Linden, Joseph A. Sparano, Judith O. Hopkins, Chamath De Silva, and Edith A. Perez, Paul Haluska, and Tufia Haddad led study sites and/or cooperative groups that enrolled patients and collected data for the analysis. Beiyun Chen served as pathologist throughout the trial and participated in study design. Matthew Goetz and Paul Haluska supervised all aspects of the study. Matthew Goetz supervised data interpretation and provided critical review of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript. |
ISSN: | 0167-6806 1573-7217 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10549-021-06221-8 |