Induction of spermatogenesis in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Purpose We compared our clinical experience to international standards, assessed by response to treatment and pregnancy rates to ensure our results were comparable. Methods Men presenting with azoospermia related to hypogonadism were recruited into a treatment programme which was managed by one pers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 803 - 807
Main Authors: Morris, Guy C., Lloyd-Evans, Esther, Cahill, David J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01-04-2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose We compared our clinical experience to international standards, assessed by response to treatment and pregnancy rates to ensure our results were comparable. Methods Men presenting with azoospermia related to hypogonadism were recruited into a treatment programme which was managed by one person over 8 years in a secondary care facility. Treatment followed published management plans using urinary gonadotropins. Data were collected on success rates in spermatogenesis, as well as variables which might predict success, and costs. Statistical analysis used non-parametric methods. Results Of 16 men with HH, 14 achieved spermatogenesis, and 9 had sperm cryopreserved. Of those 14, 6 were successful in achieving a pregnancy with their partner from assisted conception (including ICSI) and one after natural conception. Factors identified to identify men likely to be successful in treatment were whether testicular volume was larger at onset of gonadotropins (median 10 mL) with a trend towards greater success if the cause developed after puberty. Mean treatment costs per man treated amounted to GP£4379/UD$5377 (figures for September 2020). Summary Success rates from this treatment should exceed 70% in most clinical settings. The likelihood of success improves when testicular volume exceeded 10 mL at initiation of treatment and a trend exists whereby success is more likely whereby when hypogonadism developed after puberty. Treatment costs are at a level likely to benefit quality of life, supporting the delivery of this treatment and where necessary and possible, funding it in line with other fertility treatments. This treatment should be available much more widely as a management option for men with hypogonadism, allowing them to father a biological child, rather than using donor sperm.
ISSN:1058-0468
1573-7330
DOI:10.1007/s10815-020-02058-0