Optimizing Accuracy of Proximal Femur Elastic Modulus Equations

Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) is a promising tool to predict femoral properties. One of the modeling parameters required as input for QCT/FEA is the elastic modulus, which varies with the location-dependent bone mineral density (ash density). The aim of thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of biomedical engineering Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 1391 - 1399
Main Authors: Rezaei, Asghar, Carlson, Kent D., Giambini, Hugo, Javid, Samad, Dragomir-Daescu, Dan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01-06-2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) is a promising tool to predict femoral properties. One of the modeling parameters required as input for QCT/FEA is the elastic modulus, which varies with the location-dependent bone mineral density (ash density). The aim of this study was to develop optimized equations for the femoral elastic modulus. An inverse QCT/FEA method was employed, using an optimization process to minimize the error between the predicted femoral stiffness values and experimental values. We determined optimal coefficients of an elastic modulus equation that was a function of ash density only, and also optimal coefficients for several other equations that included along with ash density combinations of the variables sex and age. All of the optimized models were found to be more accurate than models from the literature. It was found that the addition of the variables sex and age to ash density made very minor improvements in stiffness predictions compared to the model with ash density alone. Even though the addition of age did not remarkably improve the statistical metrics, the effect of age was reflected in the elastic modulus equations as a decline of about 9% over a 60-year interval.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-6964
1573-9686
DOI:10.1007/s10439-019-02238-9